• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

[Help Thread] Blindfolded discussion and help

mark49152

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
4,675
Likes
3,209
Location
UK
WCA
2015RIVE05
YouTube
mark49152
???
5BLD I imagine to memo midges first, but then you don't know if you have to memo the swap.But my main issue, memoing a swap on 4BLD?
How does that even work?
You memo corners first, and if parity then memo and solve the UB and UL wings into swapped positions. The benefit is less with 4BLD though, as although you can avoid solving PLL parity during corners, wing parity is independent and more expensive to solve.

It's more worthwhile in 5BLD as corner/midge parity otherwise involves fixing wings as well as midges, which is also expensive.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2018
Messages
52
Likes
41
Location
Belgium
WCA
2014RONG01
It just seems odd to me to memo centers than wings than corners than midges and inverse midges and corners during execution.
I like my solves linear during bigbld, but then again I'm not good at the bigbld.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2018
Messages
1
Likes
1
Location
Switzerland
WCA
2017MINA04
Hi all, I need help to become more consistent in blind events.

I'm using comms with UBL/UF buffers, am around 50 s in 3bld (memo 15 / pausy exe 25-45…), and keep DNFing a lot. Especially officially where my success rate is lower than 15% for 3bld and even worse for bigBLD. I also can't get good MultiBLD attempts.

I think my main problem is that I forget my memo as soon as I have to think about a comm. I also have better attempts if I don't review the memo, which is what I'm kind of afraid to do officially. At comps, I get nervous and review much too often, which is also why I'm much slower than at home.

At the recent Swiss Nationals I was seeded top 3 for 3-5bld, but DNFed all of it. The initial frustration is slowly turning into motivation again, any advice?

I was thinking about drilling exe/comms and maybe try some rush mini multiBLDs where I'll focus on thinkahead during exe…
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
150
Likes
147
Location
South Africa
WCA
2017SWAR03
Okay so I am transitioning to 3 style. Focus on corners for now, will start edges as soon as I'm more confident in corners.
After watching Jake Klassen's video on his opinion of intermediate methods, I decided to entirely do 3 style by myself. So I did a corner scramble and then memo'd, then during exec I would figure out the comms, worked pretty okay.
The thing is, I basically setup one of my targets of the letter pair to either UBL, UBR, UFL and then do the optimal comm for that cycle (I know the optimal for any comm involving those 3 as one of the targets)
UFR-BUL-LDB I would do either L setup into UFR- UFL- LFU optimal comm of: [U' R:[R D R', U2]], or I would do a B' setup into UFR-UBL-BUR. Typing it now I think the former is better due to both the B move in the other and the less nice comm
But for example the cycle UFR-LFU-LFD if I did that it'd be a L' B' setup which is gross, and then that comm. The optimal is obviously [U' R' U, L'].

I have watched Noah's tutorial and finding which two targets can be interchanged by a move and then the opposite layer will be the second move in the insertion, but this would mean a lot of rotations. Like UFR-LUB-RFD would be [x' U':[D', R U R']] whereas this comm: [D' R U:[R' D R' U]] is optimal, probably.
Basically I can choose between setups to a U face target and doing a comm, or doing it like Noah's tutorial. My plan from there is to optimalize my comms from A-X one by one, which will eliminate bad comms bit by bit, or atleast improve bad comms by a little, as setup locations are more.

Can anyone maybe give me their opinion on this or give me some advice?
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
633
Likes
150
Location
Vancouver, BC, Canada
WCA
2010MATT02
YouTube
Keroma03
The optimal is obviously [U' R' U, L'].
Is it obvious? I use R' U' setup.

[...]
After watching Jake Klassen's video on his opinion of intermediate methods, I decided to entirely do 3 style by myself.
[...]
Can anyone maybe give me their opinion on this or give me some advice?
Do you mean you want to create your own list yourself from scratch, instead of using other people's lists?

If you don't mind using other lists, I'd recommend going through each case one at a time as follows. Try and find something good, then check out a few lists to see if there is anything nicer that you missed. If you find something nicer in a list, but it's "too complicated" (you don't feel comfortable with following or understanding it, or whatever) at this stage, then just leave that case blank and move to the next one. If you find something nice, yourself or on a list, then put it in your list. Once finished, go through all the blanks again after a break. You'll probably find some of the "too complicated" algs more reasonable by now, and might even discover them on your own. Repeat. (This process could take a few days or a few months, doesn't really matter.)
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
150
Likes
147
Location
South Africa
WCA
2017SWAR03
Is it obvious? I use R' U' setup.
Oh yes that one is also nice. I figured the other one out myself from a different angle or something, then saw it on someone's list.
I don't mind using lists, my plan was using Graham's list and then like you said, look for other ones when I get cases I don't like.
If you don't mind using other lists, I'd recommend going through each case one at a time as follows. Try and find something good, then check out a few lists to see if there is anything nicer that you missed. If you find something nicer in a list, but it's "too complicated" (you don't feel comfortable with following or understanding it, or whatever) at this stage, then just leave that case blank and move to the next one. If you find something nice, yourself or on a list, then put it in your list. Once finished, go through all the blanks again after a break. You'll probably find some of the "too complicated" algs more reasonable by now, and might even discover them on your own. Repeat. (This process could take a few days or a few months, doesn't really matter.)
This sounds like advice for when I want to optimalize my comms, right? Or did you mean for now? Because I am still confused about whether this
The thing is, I basically setup one of my targets of the letter pair to either UBL, UBR, UFL and then do the optimal comm for that cycle
is fine for while I do your suggested plan? Thanks
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
633
Likes
150
Location
Vancouver, BC, Canada
WCA
2010MATT02
YouTube
Keroma03
This sounds like advice for when I want to optimalize my comms, right? Or did you mean for now? Because I am still confused about whether this
[...]
is fine for while I do your suggested plan? Thanks
I guess I kind of meant for optimizing your list right from the start.

If you want to make a list and then optimize it later then I'm not sure I have any particular advice for that. But I don't think that's very efficient; though obviously it depends on what your priorities are. One downside is that you will form habits of doing 'bad' setups like L moves and such.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
4
Likes
1
So I am currently learning OP for 3BLD edges and I want to learn TuRBo later on but the problem is I can't really grasp OP but I think TuRBo would be a lot easier for me to understand. I don't know why, but the concept sounds really great to me, it's probably the UF buffer and the simple 3-cycle algs that I enjoy. What do I do?
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
150
Likes
147
Location
South Africa
WCA
2017SWAR03
I have no experience with Turbo but IMO I would recommend M2 for edges. It takes less moves than OP edges. OP edges are quite easy to understand.. maybe continue using it until you grasp how the method works. Then I would advise stay with OP corners and use M2 edges. J perm has a tutorial on it on YouTube.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
4
Likes
1
I have no experience with Turbo but IMO I would recommend M2 for edges. It takes less moves than OP edges. OP edges are quite easy to understand.. maybe continue using it until you grasp how the method works. Then I would advise stay with OP corners and use M2 edges. J perm has a tutorial on it on YouTube.
Thanks, I have considered M2 in the past but I don't really like the idea that much, and if I don't use a method that I don't enjoy using, the whole event just becomes a struggle to improve and just robotically doing things, whereas with a method I enjoy, it's actually fun and I feel like I'm actually putting the effort I want to put in. The same thing happened to me with CFOP and Roux. Either way, thanks, and also sorry if some parts are incoherent since I come from Romania and also I'm but a mere child.
 

Want to hide this ad and support the community?
Top