• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Hardware suggestions

MarkA64

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2019
Messages
165
Location
NY
WCA
2019ABRA07
YouTube
Visit Channel
My suggestions for future hardware (for 3x3):

-Utilizes by-hand tensioning system (like the XS dual tensioning system or numerical IPG of the Gan X) instead of traditional screw system. This is to ensure an easy way to get perfect tensions. Get rid of traditional screws.
-Comes factory PVC coated.
-Edge and corner caps are not removable (one piece, again like Gan cubes) to prevent pops or damage.
-55mm in size (new standard).

Discuss!
 

Rainger

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2020
Messages
70
My suggestions for future hardware (for 3x3):

-Utilizes by-hand tensioning system (like the XS dual tensioning system or numerical IPG of the Gan X) instead of traditional screw system. This is to ensure an easy way to get perfect tensions. Get rid of traditional screws.
-Comes factory PVC coated.
-Edge and corner caps are not removable (one piece, again like Gan cubes) to prevent pops or damage.
-55mm in size (new standard).

Discuss!
My GAN X V2 is a lot like this. You see this happening soon for GAN or another company making this move first?
 

MarkA64

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2019
Messages
165
Location
NY
WCA
2019ABRA07
YouTube
Visit Channel
My GAN X V2 is a lot like this. You see this happening soon for GAN or another company making this move first?
Other companies definitely need to follow suit. And as for Gan, they just need to work on a 55mm cube and try to create an entirely new feeling cube (different structure of the pieces) IMO.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2020
Messages
452
Location
well, a country.
I'm not sure how I feel about this since I use stickerless black on a few of my mains so unless the cubes come in black stickerless variants I don't want this to be a thing
I don't think unremovable edge and corner pieces are very good, because, you can never clean your cube and it will be against Gan's intention's and many cube companies' intention "to make everything as customizable as possible" because : 1: you can't change the magnet 2. you can't lube the pieces, and the pieces will be very dry, which also brings up another world of issues.

edit : wait da minute it's caps, ignore what I said lol
 

Zain_A24

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2019
Messages
198
This might already be a thing with GAN but since they have a tonne of GES and IPG systems, if there was an option to choose an IPG, GES and mechanism of any cube and make your own cube, sort of how you would build a pc from the various components you prefer. I am currently using an obscure combination of pieces and core for reasons I have mentioned on social media and I particularly like it.
 
Last edited:

MarkA64

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2019
Messages
165
Location
NY
WCA
2019ABRA07
YouTube
Visit Channel
I just had a thought that the next Gan flagship should definitely have Center Piece Magnets (like the Valk Elite) in order for them to stay on top of the game. I really want a Gan cube that feels like the X but doesn't overshoot at times (not necessarily the XS), and I think center magnets would help a lot. More friction is good too. Also, just like Zan_A24 said, there are already a lot of different possible combinations for Gan cubes, so that's really good. For me, I made a Gan cube with X pieces, XS core, and GES+ nuts from the 356 M. Again, center magnets would be a good addition.
 

Sub1Hour

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Messages
723
Location
43°38'42.8"N 115°59'35.1"W
My suggestions for future hardware (for 3x3):

-Utilizes by-hand tensioning system (like the XS dual tensioning system or numerical IPG of the Gan X) instead of traditional screw system. This is to ensure an easy way to get perfect tensions. Get rid of traditional screws.
I am not a fan of these systems because it feels like they have 1 of 2 problems
1. The settings are too far apart and I cant find a good balance
2. The settings are unable to be tight enough
-Comes factory PVC coated.
PVC coating seems more like a gimmick to me. It fixes a problem that I have never had. If there was an option for a non PVC coating that would be nice.
-Edge and corner caps are not removable (one piece, again like Gan cubes) to prevent pops or damage.
I would agree with this if cube companies started making stickerless black cubes standard. I know many people that prefer black on some puzzles (For me its squan and mega). I dont find any problems with caps being damaged and if they do get damaged it can either be fixed easily, or you can just buy a replacement piece for 2-3 dollars.
-55mm in size (new standard).
I agree that cube sizes should be more diverse but I don't think that all cubes should be 55. I myself have quite big hands and although I can still use smaller cubes just fine it makes my hands feel like they aren't able to do what I want them to.

I'll give my take for what I want in 3x3 hardware

- Cubes that take feel to the extreme (ie. Papery, Smooth, Crispy, Clacky)
- No more frosted plastic for any cubes
- Interchangeable black pieces on all cubes
- Gan cubes that aren't the same design they have been using since the air
I'll give a square-1 wish list as well so I can plug the race thread

- Corner cutting without QSS (Qiyi Square-1 Syndrome)
- MGC and/or Huanglong Squan
cough cough 6x6 hardware cough cough there are so many brands of clocks to choose from cough cough gan cubes are so cheap!
MGC 6x6, ever tried one? Monster Go, I thought you replied to that thread?
I agree with you on clock since it been FOUR YEARS since moyu teased a clock on Facebook.
 

Sub1Hour

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Messages
723
Location
43°38'42.8"N 115°59'35.1"W
problubly to get people-to get excited about the moyu glock so they would boycott lingao or something.
Do you even sentence bro? All jokes aside I doubt that was the case since it looked exactly like a stock lingao with different clocks and pins. I don't think that they even made a design for a clock aside from different colored clocks and magnetic pins.
 

PetrusQuber

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
2,008
Location
my house, cubing.
YouTube
Visit Channel
Since we’re going to the limit with 3x3 design now, having several different ‘Flagships’ from each company with different feels would be nice. We buy different cubes for their feel - clacky, smooth, sandy, etc, but what if one manufacturer had that all, plus their customization and everything.
 

MarkA64

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2019
Messages
165
Location
NY
WCA
2019ABRA07
YouTube
Visit Channel
I am not a fan of these systems because it feels like they have 1 of 2 problems
1. The settings are too far apart and I cant find a good balance
2. The settings are unable to be tight enough
The XS can get really tight by hand. Another benefit of the system is you can emulate professional settings. But, even though it's convenient, the cube definitely sacrificed corner cutting, specifically in the stickerless version.

Gan will probably continue to do better.
 

Sub1Hour

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Messages
723
Location
43°38'42.8"N 115°59'35.1"W
The XS can get really tight by hand. Another benefit of the system is you can emulate professional settings. But, even though it's convenient, the cube definitely sacrificed corner cutting, specifically in the stickerless version.

Gan will probably continue to do better.
I hope that they use something that is much finer like on the WRm/GTS3. I like that on the WRm you can have 18 settings that range from crazy loose to crazy tight. I also like how the gan X lets you choose between numerical IPG and standard IPG. I hope that in the future all cubes can give you the choice between hand tensions and traditional screw-like tensions so people can choose what best fits for them.
 
Top