My PB scramble on 3x3 is F2 D2 L2 B2 R2 F2 D U2 B2 U2 R2 D B U' L F' D B2 F2 UHave you ever gotten a REALLY lucky scramble, where you start with a semi-solved cube?
I got this scramble for the 2x2x2 form JNetCube timer:
L B2 D L D2 L' D F' U' R F2 D B2 U' F' L D F' U2 R2 B R' B2 U' F2
Anybody have any?
1.28F' U' F2 R' F' R U F2 R'
I didn't sub-1 this scramble because I locked up at the end.
Solve: R2 U R' U
A 36, which is slightly better than average for me. I don't know anything besides the beginner's method, though.I smashed my square-1 PB of 8.293, and I'm honestly not proud of it because of this:
(-2,0)/ (3,0)/ (5,-1)/ (0,-3)/ (1,-2)/ (3,-3)/ (0,-1)/ (6,0)/ (6,0)/ (0,-2)/ (-3,0)/
Cubeshape already solved, easy forced EO skip, regular CP alg, then M2 U2 M2 for EP
12.93 on yellow cross.L2 F2 U R2 D L2 U' B2 U' L2 F U' L2 U' L' F L2 R2 D'
Can be done pretty weirdly for 222. Some Suedo-F2L type stuff.
F D' B D F // 2x2x2
EDIT: also 3 move cross.
It means you never break EO. Skipping EO is crazy rare, but never breaking it at all is stupid and may not be generated by csTimer(idk). This usually is a red flag for being faked. While it doesn't result in an insane solve, I still think it's fake because it's a 5 move XCross with a good solution afterword(which can definitely happen, but considering it never broke EO...)What about it?
Try doing a reconstruction
Here's my solution (7.79 first try, got sub-5.5 knowing the solution ahead of time)Try doing a reconstruction
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|How to Solve a Clock || Easy Tutorial||Puzzle Video Gallery||0|
|Here are some really interesting and easy patterns that you can make on a 3x3!||Puzzle Video Gallery||0|
|Is this scramble lucky or easy/ or both?||General Speedcubing Discussion||64|
|T||[Unofficial] EASY scramble yet nonlucky||Puzzle Video Gallery||4|
|[Unofficial] Non-lucky 9.63, VERY easy scramble||Puzzle Video Gallery||19|