CPEOLL/2L2GLL as an Effective 3LLL System?

[goodatthis]

I don't know if this has been discussed at length already or not, but I was thinking- why not use CPEOLL and then 2 look 2GLL by doing an RU OCLL and then doing EPLL. There's about 15 algs that's are really easy to learn for CPEOLL, and fast, then there's really just 4 or 5 OCLL algs to learn because most of the ones you have learned are already 2 gen, and then 4 EPLLs. So that's basically only about 25 algs, and they're easy to learn, and fast to execute, compared to 2LOLL/PLL, which is about 30, and PLLs are long.

Is some CPEOLL worth learning along with RU variants of my OCLLs? I think it's more underrated that it should be.

 

[weirdesky]

I don't know if this has been discussed at length already or not, but I was thinking- why not use CPEOLL and then 2 look 2GLL by doing an RU OCLL and then doing EPLL. There's about 15 algs that's are really easy to learn for CPEOLL, and fast, then there's really just 4 or 5 OCLL algs to learn because most of the ones you have learned are already 2 gen, and then 4 EPLLs. So that's basically only about 25 algs, and they're easy to learn, and fast to execute, compared to 2LOLL/PLL, which is about 30, and PLLs are long.

Is some CPEOLL worth learning along with RU variants of my OCLLs? I think it's more underrated that it should be.

The problem with this method (and I've tried it, albeit a two-look, Cpeo + full 2GLL version) is that recognition for CPEO is just awful. Recognition for 2GLL is similarly bad. The algs for CpEO are all beautiful, though

 

[TheNextFeliks]

People have suggested this of course. 2GLL is pretty good algs and decent recognition. CPEO algs are fine but recog can be kinda ugly.

 

[scottishcuber]

People have suggested this of course. 2GLL is pretty good algs and decent recognition. CPEO algs are fine but recog can be kinda ugly.

You can just use OLLCP recognition for CPEOLL, which is really easy.