• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!
What do you mean by color contrast?
Have you ever cubed in bad light and had trouble telling white and yellow apart? Or do you know a guy thst has a mild form of colourblindness, that just annoys to tell two adjacent colours apart?

This is partially the reason Mats Valk likes Green cross so much. It helps them differentiate LL.

Colour contrast is a huge thing in the outside of cubing world on how colours clash with each other and how you are able to see those.
You might not be red-green blind and still have trouble reading red text on green background if the shades are right, as an example.
 
Yau is a better version of redux, so actually that was your question.
you're not interpreting things right

My question was if I should switch NOW or wait more while I improved further with reduction, not if I SHOULD OR NOT change to the better method. I already decided to change, that was not the question

think this way, oll is better than 2 look oll, but many cubers wait a lot before changing. some are sub10 and still don't know full oll

so I was thinking if it would be better to improve even more with centers and edges pairing before changing to yau or just switch immediately

the question was "should I stick with reduction for a while until I drop my times even more or switch ASAP?", not simply "should I switch to a better method?"
 
you're not interpreting things right

My question was if I should switch NOW or wait more while I improved further with reduction, not if I SHOULD OR NOT change to the better method. I already decided to change, that was not the question

think this way, oll is better than 2 look oll, but many cubers wait a lot before changing. some are sub10 and still don't know full oll

so I was thinking if it would be better to improve even more with centers and edges before changing to yau or just switch immediately

the question was "should I stick with reduction for a while until I drop my times even more or switch ASAP?", not simply "should I switch to a better method?"
I think you may be misunderstanding Yau. I've been cubing for about 8 years and still use mostly 2-look OLL because I'm too lazy to learn new algorithms. There are no new algorithms to learn for Yau, it's just doing the redux steps in a different order.
 
you're not interpreting things right

My question was if I should switch NOW or wait more while I improved further with reduction, not if I SHOULD OR NOT change to the better method. I already decided to change, that was not the question

think this way, oll is better than 2 look oll, but many cubers wait a lot before changing. some are sub10 and still don't know full oll

so I was thinking if it would be better to improve even more with centers and edges pairing before changing to yau or just switch immediately

the question was "should I stick with reduction for a while until I drop my times even more or switch ASAP?", not simply "should I switch to a better method?"

Yes, it’s worth it to learn Yau now
 
you're not interpreting things right

My question was if I should switch NOW or wait more while I improved further with reduction, not if I SHOULD OR NOT change to the better method. I already decided to change, that was not the question

think this way, oll is better than 2 look oll, but many cubers wait a lot before changing. some are sub10 and still don't know full oll

so I was thinking if it would be better to improve even more with centers and edges pairing before changing to yau or just switch immediately

the question was "should I stick with reduction for a while until I drop my times even more or switch ASAP?", not simply "should I switch to a better method?"
Just switch to yau, the earlier you switch the more time you'll have to build experience with it. I don't see any reason to wait, why would you build experience with a method that will be useless in the long run?
 
I think you may be misunderstanding Yau. I've been cubing for about 8 years and still use mostly 2-look OLL because I'm too lazy to learn new algorithms. There are no new algorithms to learn for Yau, it's just doing the redux steps in a different order.

Yes, it’s worth it to learn Yau now

Just switch to yau, the earlier you switch the more time you'll have to build experience with it. I don't see any reason to wait, why would you build experience with a method that will be useless in the long run?
Ok guys thanks
 
Been out of cubing for a while so at one point I probably knew the answer to this, but:

Could someone give (or link me to) an approximate breakdown of how fast I should be solving each stage to get sub-5:00 on 7x7?

Currently I average around 6:00 and my breakdown is roughly

first 2 centers: 1:00
next 4 centers: 2:00
F8E: 2:00
L4E: 0:40
3x3: 0:20.
 
Improvement will come with volume of solves. If you take the train to work or have some extra time in between doing things then some slow solves will help a lot. Try and get creative and use some unorthodox techniques during edges and especially centers
 
Improvement will come with volume of solves. If you take the train to work or have some extra time in between doing things then some slow solves will help a lot. Try and get creative and use some unorthodox techniques during edges and especially centers
Again, I’m just asking for a rough time breakdown, I appreciate the advice but none of this is new to me. I’ve always progressed fastest when I spend time to specifically work on my weakest areas.
 
Been out of cubing for a while so at one point I probably knew the answer to this, but:

Could someone give (or link me to) an approximate breakdown of how fast I should be solving each stage to get sub-5:00 on 7x7?

Currently I average around 6:00 and my breakdown is roughly

first 2 centers: 1:00
next 4 centers: 2:00
F8E: 2:00
L4E: 0:40
3x3: 0:20.
FWIW: I'm averaging about 5:40, I just timed splits for 3 solves, 6:04.64, 5:10.81, 5:12.25

First 2 centers:
1:20.82, 1:15.15, 1:07.54 = 1:14.50

Next 4 centers:
1:35.88, 1:23.37, 1:26.32 = 1:28.52

First 8 edges:
1:53.32, 1:22.34, 1:24.60 = 1:33.42

Last 4 edges:
36.04, 32.36, 40.82 = 36.41

3x3:
38.55, 37.58, 32.95 = 36.36

Pretty sure my weakest point is 3x3. Last 4 centers and first 8 edges are clearly faster than you, I suspect those are the areas that grinding solves may help the most with. I have about 1600 solves in my main csTimer 7x7 session.
 
Back
Top