Sniph
Member
HEllo 
Well, my LL is currently a 4-7 Look. What this means is sometimes, in the worst scenario, I will have to execute 7 algs to solve the last layer, but as little as 4. My solve time of the last layer with this method is 7-13 seconds on average, depending the cases. However, if it is a good case, you can see how fast the time is on it. I am able to do this so fast because I have memorized what happens after performing every alg i know in the LL, so there is little to no recogintion.
With a 3 look, which I am learning, the algs are alot longer. It seems they are even up to double as some algs in my method. Also, the recogintion for thses cases is alot greater then those for the 4 look. Is it possible that a well developed, fast 4-7look is better then a 3 look in some cases?
PS: I average aroud 28 seconds with Intuitive Fridrich and 4-7 Look.

Well, my LL is currently a 4-7 Look. What this means is sometimes, in the worst scenario, I will have to execute 7 algs to solve the last layer, but as little as 4. My solve time of the last layer with this method is 7-13 seconds on average, depending the cases. However, if it is a good case, you can see how fast the time is on it. I am able to do this so fast because I have memorized what happens after performing every alg i know in the LL, so there is little to no recogintion.
With a 3 look, which I am learning, the algs are alot longer. It seems they are even up to double as some algs in my method. Also, the recogintion for thses cases is alot greater then those for the 4 look. Is it possible that a well developed, fast 4-7look is better then a 3 look in some cases?
PS: I average aroud 28 seconds with Intuitive Fridrich and 4-7 Look.