Bob
Premium Member
I suppose it's worth clarifying the consequences of breaking that rule as it has happened before. When rounds are held that should not be due to a lack of competitors, the rounds that should not have been held are deleted. The fact that a WR occurred is irrelevant and should not mean exemption to this rule. Similarly, if an organizer allows too many competitors to the next round (ie - doesn't cut 25%), competitors who should not have made the next round have those results deleted. We have been doing things this way since these rules went into effect and I don't expect to see a change to this methodology any time soon.
Please note that I am commenting in general for WCA competitions and not to this specific instance since I am not making the determination on what happens. What you can expect, though, is that if the round should not have happened, the entire round will be deleted. If the round was legally held, it will stand. It is that plain and simple.
Please note that I am commenting in general for WCA competitions and not to this specific instance since I am not making the determination on what happens. What you can expect, though, is that if the round should not have happened, the entire round will be deleted. If the round was legally held, it will stand. It is that plain and simple.