Any way you could get it to work with cube explorer or something in a way that short non-commutative solutions would show up? A fair amount of the worst commutator cases have good algorithmic alternatives
Hey all, this isn't anything crazy but I thought I'd share cause a while ago I remember struggling to do it visually since I use corner memo first/execute second
Basically for the 7 pieces that aren't my buffer I have a distinct character assigned to them, that are really easy to remember in my...
I know most people use DF UBL, but I'm assuming that's because it comes from M2/OP. And people also use UF from turbo. (Which people seem to think is better)
I also see like kaijun and marcell with DFR corners so maybe that's a good idea because it's on the same layer as DF for parity?
In your...
If you don't know if it's old or new batch, it's probably old.
I sold my old one at a comp and got a new batch one and it's super fast on the inners, and I would never have any doubts about its batch
Use images for corners, them audio edges.
when you use separate systems there shouldn't really be mix up.
And for corners, don't imagine it in a location, that's a little bit of a waste and takes more time that just flying through I find
So right now I use sentence memo for corners, and audio edges for 3bld. I don't really see that changing, it works great
But for bigBLD/multi it's hard with sentences. I know I should be using images, but for the same reason I didn't start with them on 3 bld, when I close my eyes and really try...
Looking down the list a lot of those Algs actually look pretty good imo. I think that looking at it as learning a huge alg set is unfair though. Most of the Algs are just solving the pair in different ways which can help efficiency too.
A lot of Algs are the same except for something like...
I know that for normal 2H solving, VHLS isn't always quite worth it because a bad VLHS > COLL > EPLL is usually slower than insert > OLL > PLL.
But do you think that using full VLHS is worth it for OH solving to always get an EPLL? And possibly later on using EOLS (ZBLS)? I've heard people say...
On a magnetic 4x4, why do you have to have 6 in the corners, in each edge can't you have 2 magnets going towards the middle, and one going out to the corner? There's no need for the rotational symmetry to the corner