Search results
Google Search Results Community Search Results
-
-
-
S
What's in a name? CFOP or Fridrich?
lol Sorry, I'm actually a guy. I picked the name "Sue Doenim" as a pun on "psuedonym", which means "fake name". Your point still stands, though. I know that @Aerma is both female and a valued contributor.- Sue Doenim
- Post #44
- Forum: Cubing Help & Questions
-
S
The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread
The case count would be somewhere around 6000.- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,493
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
One-Answer Other Question Thread
I'm pretty sure 0/10 would be 0.0000953674316%, but I'm not totally sure about 1/10. My guess would be 0.001907348%, but I'm not sure if that's right.- Sue Doenim
- Post #1,071
- Forum: Cubing Help & Questions
-
S
[Help Thread] Roux Discussion and Help
Yeah, that would just be called an EOLR skip. There's a 1/960 or 0.104166666% chance, so it's not very common.- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,253
- Forum: Cubing Help & Questions
-
S
[Help Thread] The "Square-1 Help / Alg Sharing" thread
Jaap Scherphuis made an optimal solver you can find out about here, but it's not very user-friendly. I think maybe you could also use kSolve, but I don't know anything about it.- Sue Doenim
- Post #736
- Forum: Cubing Help & Questions
-
S
[Help Thread] The "Square-1 Help / Alg Sharing" thread
Assuming parity is correct, you'd have PLL (21), swapped PLL (22), PLL+1 (76), swapped PLL+1 (76), opp (76), and adj (76), so 271 algs if I did it right. I say that's pretty feasible, if someone is dedicated enough to square one, especially since with M2 you can easily change the case if you...- Sue Doenim
- Post #734
- Forum: Cubing Help & Questions
-
S
HD Method (2x2, alternative to CLL+)
I don't have editing access to the sheet, so I can't change it. At any rate, I don't think it makes a big difference. Recognition is pretty simple, as long as you remember that the D-layer corner is in the UBL spot.- Sue Doenim
- Post #52
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
HD Method (2x2, alternative to CLL+)
I think maybe that there's some issue with the website that hosts the pictures. I would just look at the written case descriptions. With the D-layer corner in the UBL position, you can either have a bar on F, a bar on R, a bar on both (solved), opposite on F, opposite on R, or opposite on both...- Sue Doenim
- Post #50
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
HD Method (2x2, alternative to CLL+)
Basically, to make the V, you do orientation just like in Guimond, then you do R2/L2/F2/B2/U/D moves to make the V's. A lot of the time, the second part is done or it can just be cancelled into. It's pretty intuitive, with supplements from mini-algs from Guimond. V's pretty much ended up...- Sue Doenim
- Post #47
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
Random thoughts on improving/evolving Roux for 3x3 2H that may or may not suck
Kian has his here.- Sue Doenim
- Post #13
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
[Help Thread] Roux Discussion and Help
My advice would be to check algsheets (I know that at least Kian has one specifically for SB), watch example solves, and do slow solves for practice. There's a block trainer for SB here that has full SB, square, and pair, to maybe check that out.- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,247
- Forum: Cubing Help & Questions
-
S
Does method neutral on 3x3 worth it?
I don't think the drain on your inspection would be work it. With a fixed method, your efficiency will be (marginally) better, but you won't be able to plan as much of the solve in inspection, so your solve won't go as smoothly. I think you would benefit more from an average FB+DR than from an...- Sue Doenim
- Post #18
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread
https://sites.google.com/site/rectangularcuboids/3x3x2-domino/pll- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,356
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
Magnetic vs non magnetic
I think it's interesting that for a while after magnetic cubes were first released, M slices were a really big concern, but now, no one gives them a second thought.- Sue Doenim
- Post #11
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
HD Method (2x2, alternative to CLL+)
Basically, you just do the Guimond alg, but a lot of the time you can cancel out of the alg in a way that gets you a V. When you can't, you just add a move or two to make the V's. There are a bunch of examples that I've done in the past in the 2×2 example solve thread, if you can be bothered...- Sue Doenim
- Post #44
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread
That's kinda the idea behind the HD method. It reduces to opposite V's, which is only marginally harder. Full case count doesn't actually seem very bad at all: (Sorted by color pattern on U/D face) PBL: 5 cases V's: 21 cases Adj/adj: at most 36 cases Adj/opp: at most 36 cases Opp/opp: at most...- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,348
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
[Member Intro] Roux or CFOP or ZZ?
My advice? Try them all and decide for yourself; don't make your decision based on the arguments of other people.- Sue Doenim
- Post #15
- Forum: Member Introductions
-
S
The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread
Here's an interesting idea that I don't think I've heard before: CLS, but you also permute the corners at the same time. If you attach the corner to the edge before inserting, disregarding the edge's orientation, you have about 3 times the alg count of any other CLL-type method. It would only...- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,310
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread
I think that the case count would be too high. With your bar, there are 3 different CP cases (solved, opposite, and adjacent). Then there are 6*5 permutation cases and 3*3 orientation cases for the other two corners, leaving you with an upper bound of 810 cases. There would be some repeated...- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,275
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-
S
The New Method / Substep / Concept Idea Thread
Yeah, I think that the fact that SB is solved makes it more likely that the CMLL algs will be better in a similar way to how having cross solved helps F2L to be done with a more neutral wrist position.- Sue Doenim
- Post #5,271
- Forum: General Speedcubing Discussion
-