Recent content by Czery

dat u perm.

I found the most intuitive part of square 1 to be cubeshape. You can trace every single cube shape into a tree and make optimal cubeshapes this way. This is why I enjoy solving cube shape the most. Of course, you could also be lazy and look up this awesome tree by Jaasp. You can use this tree...

Not quite sure what your looking for. Here is a OE alg that preserves corners. It performs the following swaps: DF <-> UB && RU <-> LU (0, -1) / (-3, 0) / (4, 1) / (-1, -1) / (-3, 0) / (3, 0) /

I was referring the speedcubing community's conventional limitations of the cube. For instance, the original cube was not meant to be pillowed or transparent. Most speed cubers wouldn't consider these cubes to be strictly following the 3x3 conventions. You have to acknowledge that they are...

You make a valid point here. The only reason most people see increased visibility as a problem is that they perceive these types of puzzles to go beyond the "accepted" standard of the cube. It's not that these types of cubes are more advantageous than your standard magic cube (there are) but...

Looking forward to seeing skewb WR contenders. ;)

The fact that it's going to take two years for just the beta to be released is a bit absurd. Yeah, maybe it takes years to set up manufacturer plants, sign contracts among other things but why make an announcement two years early. By the time two years are gone, I don't think these cube will...

Sorry for the late update. Round Results 97: Sub 18: Bh13: 18 (17.53) // 1/3 Spaxxy - 13 (18.59) // 0/3 Sub 15: uniacto - 15 (15.07) // 0/3 :( immortalchaos29 - 14 (15.57) // 0/3 kunparekh18 - 6 (17.07) // 0/3 Sub 12: Shane Grogan - 9 (12.66) // 0/3 CJF2L 1 - 4 (13.57) // 0/3 kasochi - 3...

fake video is fake. They could have done better.

----------------------- Round 69 Results ----------------------- Sub 20: BB1 - 18.12 Czery - 19.53 Sub 30: --------------------------- Round 70 Scrambles --------------------------- 1. (4, 0) / (-1, 2) / (-2, -5) / (6, 0) / (-3, -3) / (0, -1) / (3, 0) / (-4, -5) / (3, -2) / (1, -4) / (0...

Sorry, let me clarify. You are right. It is more advantageous to learn COLL and CLL; however, I assumed that hkpnkp only intended to learn COLL for some reason.

You don't have to use CLL/ELL with COLL.

COLL and ELL are alternatives to OLL and PLL. Both solve the LL. COLL solves the corners in one alg while preserving the orientation of the edges. ELL then solves the edges directly. It is generally agreed that OLL/PLL is easier to recognize and has more developed algs. When using OLL/PLL you...

Why not aim for sub15 ? ;)

I feel like all "legitimate" reasons stem from the fact that you don't like it. If you did enjoy feet, you probably wouldn't want it removed.