Weekly Competition 2017-41

Discussion in 'Forum Competitions' started by Mike Hughey, Oct 10, 2017.

Welcome to the Speedsolving.com. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community of over 30,000 people, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us and we'll help you get started. We look forward to seeing you on the forums!

Already a member? Login to stop seeing this message.
  1. FastCubeMaster

    FastCubeMaster Member

    1,068
    349
    Jun 30, 2015
    Brisbane, Australia
    WCA:
    2015PEAR02
    YouTube:
    FastCubeMaster
    Called it :p
     
  2. what methods do you use ?
     
  3. Sandro Pastor

    Sandro Pastor Member

    43
    0
    Oct 1, 2017
    2x2: 13.66 12.67 10.71 (10.33) (13.74)
    2x2: 13.66 12.67 10.71 (10.33) (13.74)
    3x3: 51.08 41.
    2x2: 9.40 10.20 (8.84) 9.29 (12.05) AVG: 9.63
    3x3: (51.08) 41.50 (32.24) 45.75 38.73 AVG: 41.99
     
  4. Jaysammey777

    Jaysammey777 Member

    1,196
    308
    Nov 24, 2009
    University of Georgia
    WCA:
    2010AMBR01
    YouTube:
    Jaysammey777
    Hey hey. Let's give him some credit. His clock times seem very reasonable. Assuming he has a clock and not just entering in random numbers
     
  5. 2x2: (5.54), 3.41, (3.39), 3.78, 4.48 = 3.89

    3x3: 12.67, (19.56), 12.64, 11.82, (10.98) = 12.38

    4x4: (48.62), 54.29, 51.48, (1:07.89), 54.94 = 53.57

    5x5: 1:43.47, 1:39.84, (1:36.42), (1:46.17), 1:45.45 = 1:43.92

    6x6: 3:45.34, 3:49.23, 3:29.64, (4:19.78), (3:24.06) = 3:41.40

    3x3 OH: (19.50), 20.79, 26.20, 27.09, (34.11) = 24.69

    Square 1: (27.41), 42.59, 28.61, (58.05), 29.62 = 33.61
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2017
  6. Mellis Ferton

    Mellis Ferton Member

    67
    12
    Oct 10, 2017
    Seriously? Yes, Feliks was averaging 12 seconds when he joined his first competition, but he wasn't averaging 9 seconds on 3x3, 48 seconds on 5x5, and even more ridiculous times. There is no point in faking your solves, seriously. Just be legitimate. That's what people respect the most.

    Even if they aren't faked, why would you spend money on cubes rather than a working phone, or laptop w/webcam? It just doesn't make sense.

    Have these so you can get a broader grasp of what I'm trying to say.
     
  7. Arya Vasa

    Arya Vasa Member

    4
    2
    Oct 10, 2017
  8. GarethBert11

    GarethBert11 Member

    124
    31
    Feb 1, 2014
    Indonesia
    WCA:
    2017PURB01
    Where can I see his fake results? Is it deleted?

    Edit: My bad it's in the comp website.

    P.S seriouly though 8/10 Multiblind in 15 minutes?
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2017
  9. muchacho

    muchacho Member

    1,405
    1,076
    May 27, 2015
    Spain
    WCA:
    2016ALAR01
    YouTube:
    davidalejosalarcia
    3x3: (17.07), 17.25, 20.03, (20.66), 17.81 = 18.36
     
  10. How could he not be faking? Doesn't have a phone, webcam and is too busy to go to a comp? If you are too busy to go to a comp then how are you averaging sub 50 on 5x5!?!?
     
    DGCubes likes this.
  11. Did you create a new acount? On your profile it says you've only been a member since Monday!
     
  12. if you dont have a webcam or a phone then what do you use to enter times ?
    a nokia flipphone
     
    AidanNoogie likes this.
  13. CubicOreo

    CubicOreo Member

    3
    0
    Sep 28, 2017
    2x2: 2.954
    2.612, (10.385), 2.179, 2.832, 3.419

    3x3: 12.632
    (10.357), (13.631), 12.184, 13.465, 12.249

    4x4: 56.927
    58.777, (59.139), 56.065, 55.939, (54.885)

    5x5: 1:42.607
    (1:55.952), 1:42.082, 1:50.564, (1:34.675), 1:35.176

    3x3 OH: 16.992
    15.767, 16.751, 18.459, (15.415), (23.875)

    Pyra: 4.415
    4.181, 4.826, (9.159), (3.542), 4.240

    Skewb: 5.710
    4.949, 5.225, (4.404), 6.957, (7.314+)

    Square 1: 19.876
    21.736, (25.276), 19.364, 18.528, (18.063)

    Kilo: 42.061
    50.451, (50.539), 35.712, (33.640), 40.021

    Mega: 1:32.018
    (1:38.324), 1:35.743, 1:31.826, (1:23.785), 1:28.487
     
  14. Mike Hughey

    Mike Hughey Super Moderator Staff Member

    8,700
    272
    Jun 7, 2007
    Indianapolis
    WCA:
    2007HUGH01
    YouTube:
    MikeHughey1
    I'm sorry; your results simply do not seem trustworthy. It only seems fair to those here with spectacular legitimate results that we do not allow the competition to be polluted by what seems to be obviously untrustworthy results. We have backed up your results, and we intend to remove them on Saturday, assuming there is no evidence to prove we should not. If evidence ever turns up to show that these were legitimate results, we will restore them from the backup.

    For anyone who has faked results, please note that this community has proven itself to be very forgiving to those who come clean. There are at least two examples of very famous cubers I can think of who have faked results at some point in their careers, have admitted their mistake, and now are highly respected members of the community. On the other hand, there are other examples of (in)famous cubers who faked results, refused to ever admit it, and are now held in very low regard by most of the cubing community. So please, if you have made false claims, admit your mistake.
     
  15. Arya Vasa

    Arya Vasa Member

    4
    2
    Oct 10, 2017
  16. MatsBergsten

    MatsBergsten Premium Member

    2,383
    207
    Jul 11, 2008
    Bergshamra, Sweden
    WCA:
    2008BERG04
    as is your 2bld :). If you think 2:34 is a slow time at 2bld, what do you think of
    your second solve which took a lot more than half an hour ;)?
     
  17. roasted
     
  18. Jacck

    Jacck Member

    167
    137
    Jan 26, 2016
    South-Germany
    WCA:
    2013HUBH01
    I just think, that Mike and Mats spend so much time every week for us, so that we have a really fantastic competition, that there shouldn't be any question for anyone here about faking or competing!
     
  19. Mellis Ferton

    Mellis Ferton Member

    67
    12
    Oct 10, 2017
    The OH solve (U R2 U2 F2 D' B2 D L2 D' B2 R2 B L2 R U B' R2 F2 R' D2 U) had 2 pairs already made. :D
     

Share This Page