mark49152
Premium Member
That's exactly the problem. Maybe you simply posted it too early. You've claimed that full 5-style is viable and that you have a "learning mechanism" that will enable you to master it, but you have not told us what that mechanism is or how you have validated it. You just keep repeating that learning full 5-style is possible, and expecting us to take that at face value. Well, my belief today is that it's not humanly possible to learn 200,000 algs in 4 years, and only a very good explanation will change my belief. The problem is one of quantity, but you are not addressing that. Instead, you are making vague qualitative statements about comm types and setups, etc. Unless you can provide a quantitative explanation of how you have broken down 5-style into some manageable system and amount of work, your claim lacks credibility.this is still in its baby phase
(Besides which, there's the important question of whether it would be worth the effort and faster than 3-style. Even if you could learn it all, you would have worse algs with worse recall and less practice.)
Last edited: