• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 30,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Solving with macros and functions

Joined
May 24, 2016
Messages
55
Likes
15
YouTube
filipemtx
Thread starter #1
So today I was wondering...

Let's say you have a cube simulator that allows a limited number of macros (algorithms and triggers) and functions (invert and mirror).

You could use functions to modify any macro

A macro could be executed instantaneously.

So the question is:

What times could be achieved by using moves, functions and a limited number of macros?

What would be the optimal number of macros, maybe 30? Roux cmll and some triggers for blockbuilding and lse?

I want to know what you guys think of this interesting concept.

I am curious to know what would be the best use of macros to achieve the fastest time
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
1,334
Likes
766
#2
The cube group can be completely generated with two elements, so the bare minimum would be two macros, although you might need to repeat them loads of times to get them to do what you want.

For "speedsolving", I think the absolute fastest method would just be old Pochmann. Trace the whole cube in inspection (or at least some of it) and just type out the memo as fast as possible.
 
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
13
Likes
5
Location
Palo Alto, CA
WCA
2015LYON01
#3
This is a cool idea, I would love to see this in action. If I have time, I'll try to program this.
This system allows thinking of every macro as a sticker rearrangement.
BLD methods are great at sticker rearrangement and easy with macros, so maybe no inspection would work better.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
21
Likes
3
#5
I have considered the problem of solving the cube using a small set of primitive macros such as:

A tri-corner swap

F' R L F' R F L' F' R' F R' F

A tri-edge swap

F' U F' U' F' U' F' U F U F2

A tandem edge+corner swap

R U2 F' R' F U' F' R F U' R' U'

A corner twist

F R U F U' B U F' U' R' F' R B' R'

An edge flip

U F' U F R B L U' F U' F' L' B' R'

And the 24 cubic rotation symmetries used to orient the cube before applying the above macros.

It would be an interesting question what the diameter of the cube group would be using these generators.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
21
Likes
3
#7
There are many possible low generator solutions. Check out http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/threads/the-entire-cube-is-2-gen.19751/ for more. An easy one, if rotations are allowed, is <x, y, U>, but that is pretty intuitive.
I chose the above macros in the context of what is the minimum a person needs to know in order to solve the cube. You can tell a novice that all he has to learn is these five macros and he can solve the cube simply by repeatedly applying them.
 
Top