• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Official Blindfold Algorithm List

malcolm

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
165
Location
New Zealand
U2M2U2M2 is faster, less moves. Its actually the same as yours, but you had the M2 at the end as M' twice at the beginning and start.
 

fanwuq

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
2,831
WCA
2008FANW01
YouTube
Visit Channel
my algs:
CP: lars v's A perms and their reflections.
EP: Erik's M trigger U, Z, and H perms.
CO: 1/sune from left hand, sune from right hand.
2/inverse of that
3/triple sune, H perm, U2
4/sune,U, U perm,U
5/ other COLL-PLL combos.
EO: macky's BLD EO
 

fanwuq

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
2,831
WCA
2008FANW01
YouTube
Visit Channel
For CO, I do color neutral and it always turns out to be COLL cases on opposite layers and setup with xyz turns. Macky apparently did not like this idea, but I don't see why it won't work.
">I do CO color neutral.

You mean replacing U/D with, for example, F/B? So you would change the
restriction on the set-up moves when solving the permutation?

>There is always a face-pair that you can do COLL without any setup.

Is this easy to prove?

-macky"

Perhaps he didn't understand my confusing explanation. Don't change set up restrictions, simply do xyz as set up for CO only.
 

Lucas Garron

Administrator
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
3,718
Location
California
WCA
2006GARR01
YouTube
Visit Channel
>There is always a face-pair that you can do COLL without any setup.

Is this easy to prove?

-macky"

Perhaps he didn't understand my confusing explanation. Don't change set up restrictions, simply do xyz as set up for CO only.
It's not easy to prove. In fact, it's impossible.
That's because there's an easy disproof. :p

U R U2 R U R2 U2 L' D' R F'

EDIT:
Wow, I was silly. There's a REALLY easy disproof: U L2 U' B R2 B' U L2 U' B R2 B'
 
Last edited:

fanwuq

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
2,831
WCA
2008FANW01
YouTube
Visit Channel
wow, that scramble is so weird! I don't think that kind of situation is very common. I suppose I can memorize more algorithms for weird cases. So it's not always, but most of the time?
 

Lucas Garron

Administrator
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
3,718
Location
California
WCA
2006GARR01
YouTube
Visit Channel
wow, that scramble is so weird! I don't think that kind of situation is very common. I suppose I can memorize more algorithms for weird cases. So it's not always, but most of the time?
19/27 of the time. (70.37%)

Now I wanna see a simple explanation for that (i.e. why we can treat CO on the axes as independent).
Hey, does this apply to center permutation orientation definition schemes? Hmm...
 

fanwuq

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
2,831
WCA
2008FANW01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I realized that
U R U2 R U R2 U2 L' D' R F'
isn't too bad, You can do opposite side sunes and do headlights on another face. Now is there a case where you have to applied 4 algorithms to solve CO?
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
22
Is this useful?

Corner Orientation (1 2 4)
(L2 D' L U2 L' D L U2 y' L' B L F L' B' L)

and mirror alg on opposite side.

:)
 
Top