# Odd Question for a novice to cubing

Discussion in 'Cubing Help & Questions' started by Tortuga, Apr 4, 2012.

Welcome to the Speedsolving.com. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community of over 30,000 people, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

1. ### TortugaMember

2
0
Apr 4, 2012
I'm just going to get this out of the way. I don't cube, I've never done this sort of thing before. The fact is, I'm trying to find a solution to a problem involving a "megaminx", and I googled it, finding you guys. Here goes.

I play a text-based MUD, somewhat popular but not greatly populated. One of the older players has coded in a visual representation of a megaminx (I only found out what this was by asking around) in text. Each of the twelve sides seems to be in colour (red, cyan, blue, green, that sort of thing). I can view the top and bottom to see what sections are connected to what, and I can view each particular side's colour as well as a somewhat clear depiction of what side is what colour. I can turn the sides in one direction, and switch to view each side as needed.

What would I have to do or provide in order to have someone assist me in solving this?

File size:
148.7 KB
Views:
115
2. ### KirjavaColourful

6,123
17
Mar 26, 2006
WCA:
2006BARL01
snkenjoi
Someone would pretty much have to do it for you, which would probably suck since the control scheme looks horrible.

Aug 12, 2010
Aberdeen, Scotland
Godmil
Oh wow, that looks harder than I'd ever like to do.
The thing with the Megaminx is, while it's not technically a 'complicated' puzzle to solve, it does take a lot of time/moves. Only looking at one side at a time steps up the complexity greatly I'm afraid, I know how to do a mexaminx, but it would probably take me hours on something like that... and you really don't want to mess up on the last layer then have to go back several stages.. that would be a nightmare.

4. ### applemobileMember

858
1
Jan 8, 2012
exeter uk
Would be made easier I you could transfer the scramble onto a virtual megaminx, or even a real one if you could, Solve it on there and transfer each move a cross that you do. Easier than trying to solve it on there.

5. ### TortugaMember

2
0
Apr 4, 2012

As for "looking at only one side at a time", you can look at any side you wish, and switch between them freely. I'm not sure if that's what you meant.

6. ### qqwrefMember

7,832
17
Dec 18, 2007
a <script> tag near you
WCA:
2006GOTT01
qqwref2
Yeah, only being able to look at one side at a time makes it a lot more mentally difficult to solve. (I guess it would be kind of like trying to proofread an essay while only being able to see one word at a time.) The control scheme doesn't sound particularly easy either. I can easily imagine this taking a long time and a ton of moves.

I'm really curious who coded it.

8. ### Vipervenom9Member

56
0
Jul 8, 2009
Salt Lake City, Utah