General MGLS discussion.

Discussion in 'General Speedcubing Discussion' started by StachuK1992, Jun 4, 2010.

Welcome to the Speedsolving.com. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community of over 30,000 people, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us and we'll help you get started. We look forward to seeing you on the forums!

Already a member? Login to stop seeing this message.
  1. StachuK1992

    StachuK1992 statue

    3,809
    27
    Jul 24, 2008
    West Chester, PA
    WCA:
    2008KORI02
    YouTube:
    StachuK1992
    Enh.
    For me, ELS is meh when intuitive, and decent when not.
    CLS is just sexy, and fasts.
     
  2. One thing about MGLS-P is that for people who don't want to learn the 104 CLS algs. You can always use EJF2L which basically is the 16 CLS case where the corner is already in place but twisted. Here are some helpful videos:
    Petrus + MGLS = EJF2L
    EJF2L examples
    EJF2L cases
     
  3. deepSubDiver

    deepSubDiver Member

    161
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    Germany
    I just set up an example solve with my own variation.

    Code:
    Scramble:
    	R' L2 D B' F R D R D2 F R' D' R B2 U2 F' B2 R2 U' D2 F2 L U2 B2 U'
    
    EOLine:
    	x2 y L' F L' B' D' F
    LH F2L:
    	R2 U R L U' R U2 R U' L2
    CP:
    	L U' R' U L'
    F2l minus slot:
    	U R2 U' R2
    ELS:
    	U R U' R'
    CLS:
    	U2 R U2 R' U R U2 R' U2 R U R'
    U-perm
     
  4. oprah62

    oprah62 Member

    1,002
    0
    May 2, 2010
    CA
    WCA:
    2010PEDR01
    YouTube:
    oprah62
    also, one f2l pair less, also, the cross he describes is on d
     
  5. Sa967St

    Sa967St Not A Moderator

    3,794
    17
    Mar 11, 2008
    Waterloo, ON, Canada
    WCA:
    2007STRO01
    YouTube:
    Sa967St
    It's not supposed an improvement (nor a dis-improvement), it's just alternate way of doing LS+OLL. Although there are more algorithms to learn, many of the algorithms are quite easy to learn... and yes <R,U> is sexy. :p
     
  6. Weston

    Weston Premium Member

    980
    16
    May 22, 2009
    WCA:
    2008MIZU01
    YouTube:
    thewestonian
    I strongly considered learning this for OH and learned a bunch of algs for it. (Somewhere between 20-30. I don't really remember)
    But I strayed away from it for two reasons.
    1. I wanted to use COLL for OH since I was already learning CLL for 2x2 at the time
    2. I realized that instead of spending time learning new algs, I could just spend that time practicing my OLLs, or learning a few new algs for bad cases.

    I'm not saying that its bad idea to learn MGLS, but I just saw practicing OLLs as a better investment of my time instead of learning algs, and then getting them fast after that.
    I do wish that I had learned MGLS instead of OLL though.
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2010
  7. oprah62

    oprah62 Member

    1,002
    0
    May 2, 2010
    CA
    WCA:
    2010PEDR01
    YouTube:
    oprah62
    yeah you're right about OH tech for coll vs. mgls, however some case s for cls and els are soooo easy its good to know because you can benefit from that, as the first example shown, the els is super easy
     
  8. musicninja17

    musicninja17 Member

    475
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    WCA:
    2010FISK01
    I would have to agree that ELS is super intuitive....
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2010
  9. nlCuber22

    nlCuber22 Member

    1,592
    3
    Dec 1, 2009
    East Coast, USA
    WCA:
    2010CRIS01
    YouTube:
    dwcubes1
    It's ELS, dammit!
     
  10. StachuK1992

    StachuK1992 statue

    3,809
    27
    Jul 24, 2008
    West Chester, PA
    WCA:
    2008KORI02
    YouTube:
    StachuK1992
    These kinda represent my thoughts. Right now, I care about OH more than anything else right now, as I haven't improved in 2H in forever.
    However, I've decided to do MGLS rather than OLL, just to see how it turns out.
     
  11. FatBoyXPC

    FatBoyXPC Member

    1,794
    0
    Nov 28, 2009
    WCA:
    2010LACH01
    YouTube:
    fatboyxpc
    Can I just request that all of the pertinent information from these posts (including the replies) be posted on the MGLS wiki page? The whole purpose of a wiki is to be a central location for information, and spread out amongst forum posts isn't quite centralized. It makes it easier for those noobs who get flamed without searching properly (which can be quite difficult if you use speedsolving.com instead of speedsolving.com/forum or whatever because the google search bar only displays on the forum subdirectory, not on the speedsolving index) due to the vbSearch deal not working out so great.
     
  12. nck

    nck Member

    195
    0
    Apr 13, 2010
    syd australia
    OH using ZZ+MGLS can be very sexy though...2gen+2gen+some more 2gen
    although OH plls aren't as smexy as u perms
     
  13. StachuK1992

    StachuK1992 statue

    3,809
    27
    Jul 24, 2008
    West Chester, PA
    WCA:
    2008KORI02
    YouTube:
    StachuK1992
    Oh yes, here's how I imagine my solves once I'm done with CLS:

    EO. May require a rotation for efficiency.
    F2L-1slot. 3-gen. No rotating.
    CLS - 2-gen. No rotating (except for a few cases, really).
    PLL - no rotating (1-look PLL recog, alg, AUF)

    See a trend? No rotating.
    Basically, I've noticed that I usually spend far too much time rotating in CFOP and other method solves, so now I plan to jump all the way to the other extreme.
     
  14. CuBeOrDiE

    CuBeOrDiE Member

    No rations is great, but I don't think all of those algs are worth it. Besides, you will probably rotate during EO line.
     
  15. StachuK1992

    StachuK1992 statue

    3,809
    27
    Jul 24, 2008
    West Chester, PA
    WCA:
    2008KORI02
    YouTube:
    StachuK1992
    I do my line separate, because I'm a nub, during F2L, and it requires no rotation.
    So basically, the only "necessary" rotation will be during EO, which should be completely planned out in inspection.
     
  16. CuBeOrDiE

    CuBeOrDiE Member

    how do you solve after your EO line? do you insert edges and do f2l or blockbuild? just curious.
     
  17. StachuK1992

    StachuK1992 statue

    3,809
    27
    Jul 24, 2008
    West Chester, PA
    WCA:
    2008KORI02
    YouTube:
    StachuK1992
    I do EO by itself.
    Then I basically do the line at once, basically getting one part of the line at DR and one at DL, and doing a ADF (adjust down face).
    But that's really inefficient, so I'm going to eventually switch that.

    After EOLine, I do the left block in its entirety, most of the time. It's a mixture between block-building and F2L, but mainly F2L. Eventually, I'll make it so it's with more block-building.

    Then I get the 1x2x2 in the back-right-down(DR, BR, DBR) with blockbuilding.
    Then I do the FR slot, trying to see if I happen to know either
    a) a F2LL (WV) case that I know, or
    b) a CLS case that I know (pretty much the I and Im)

    then I apply those, and move onto LL.
     
  18. mmiddymaster27

    mmiddymaster27 Member

    8
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    I cannot find an easy list of any of the CLS algorithms, does anybody know a good source? And also, ELS can be shortened to only 16 algorithms using the fairly intuitive connected cases of VHF2L
     
  19. StachuK1992

    StachuK1992 statue

    3,809
    27
    Jul 24, 2008
    West Chester, PA
    WCA:
    2008KORI02
    YouTube:
    StachuK1992
    http://cube.garron.us/MGLS/
    click the little cubes in the top (with +, -, O, etc)

    I'm personally busy compiling a list of my favorite CLS algs, with pictures, to be printable, if you can wait a day or so. Just learn the I and Im cases first, if you want to start now.
     
  20. Sir E Brum

    Sir E Brum Member

    405
    1
    Sep 24, 2008
    Charlotte, NC, USA
    WCA:
    2010HANN01
    I have considered using this method with ZZ, but there was one major turn off. Rotations. ZZ was designed as a method that could be executed with no rotations. In fact, every solve I do is rotationless except when I get this COLL case. I use R U y R U' R' U R U2 R' U' R U R' F'. The fact that you are solving the CLS in MGLS means you have a 75% chance of your rotation being off. And it leaves you with a PLL. I much prefer solving the last slot normally and doing COLL + EPLL over MGLS + PLL.
     

Share This Page