• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 30,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

[WR] Feliks Zemdegs - 5.97 3x3 average

Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Messages
190
Likes
60
Location
Mars
WCA
2017MYKL01
#44
No video yet. Awesome job Feliks!

Oops, I posted this in the WR/CR/NR area. Thought it would be there and didn't see it. Awesome job! A sub 6 single is always accompanied by large cheering, and this is a sub 6 average! We now have an official average better than Erik Akkersdijk's 7.08 single! I wonder how many were full step.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Brest

Super Reconstructor
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,263
Likes
387
WCA
2011STUA01
YouTube
BrestCubing
#47
Feliks Zemdegs - 5.97 3x3 WR av5 - Latin America Cubing Tour - Chía 2017

B' U2 R2 F' U2 L2 B' D' B' R2 B R' F2 L' B2 U2 B U'

x2 y // inspection
r' U' R2' F' U' F' D2' // Xcross
U2 L' U L // 2nd pair
U' R U2' R' L U' L' // 3rd pair
U2' R U2' R' U R U' R' // 4th pair
r U2 R' U' R U R' U' R U' r' // OLL
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U' // PLL
View at alg.cubing.net
Code:
[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	5.55	51	9.19	56	10.09	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
F2L	3.55	25	7.04	30	8.45		F2L/Total	64.0%	49.0%	53.6%
LL	2.00	26	13.00	26	13.00		LL/Total	36.0%	51.0%	46.4%

Cross+1	1.18	7	5.93	7	5.93		Cross+1/F2L	33.2%	28.0%	23.3%
OLS	1.87	19	10.16	21	11.23		OLS/Total	33.7%	37.3%	37.5%
PLL	0.80	14	17.50	14	17.50		PLL/LL		40.0%	53.8%	53.8%
B' U2 R2 F' U2 L2 B' D' B' R2 B R' F2 L' B2 U2 B U'

x2 y // inspection
r' U' R2' F' U' F' D2' // Xcross
U U L' U L // 2nd pair
U' R U' U' R' L U' L' // 3rd pair
U' U' R U' U' R' U R U' R' // 4th pair
r U2 R' U' R U R' U' R U' r' // OLL
R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U' // PLL
View at alg.cubing.net
L2 B2 L2 D2 L2 F' R' F2 D R' F2 R U' R' D' L' R

z2 // inspection
F' U' R D r F r' // Xcross
U' y' R' U2' R2 U' R2' U' R // 2nd / 3rd pairs
y' R U2' R' U' R U R' // 4th pair
U2' R U R' U' R' F R F' // OLL
R U R' U R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U2 R U' R' U' // PLL
View at alg.cubing.net
Code:
[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	5.64	54	9.57	57	10.11	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
F2L	3.57	23	6.44	26	7.28		F2L/Total	63.3%	42.6%	45.6%
LL	2.07	31	14.98	31	14.98		LL/Total	36.7%	57.4%	54.4%

Cross+1	1.77	8	4.52	9	5.08		Cross+1/F2L	49.6%	34.8%	34.6%
OLS	1.53	16	10.46	17	11.11		OLS/Total	27.1%	29.6%	29.8%
PLL	1.24	21	16.94	21	16.94		PLL/LL		59.9%	67.7%	67.7%
L2 B2 L2 D2 L2 F' R' F2 D R' F2 R U' R' D' L' R

z2 // inspection
F' U' R D r F R' R r' // Xcross
U' y' R' U2' R2 U' R2' U' R // 2nd / 3rd pairs
y' R U2' R' U' R U R' // 4th pair
U2' R U R' U' R' F R F' // OLL
R U R' U R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U2 R U' R' U' // PLL
View at alg.cubing.net
U' B2 R2 U2 R2 U B' L' U L' F' R D L' B D' F2 U'

z // inspection
R2 D R2' F' // cross
U' R' U R U' L U L' // 1st pair
U' L' U L y' U' L U L' // 2nd pair
d' R U R' y' R U R' // 3rd pair
y U R U' R' U2 R U2' R' // 4th pair
U R U R' U R U2' R' // OLL
U R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U // PLL
View at alg.cubing.net
Code:
[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	6.58	61	9.27	64	9.73	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
F2L	4.44	37	8.33	40	9.01		F2L/Total	67.5%	60.7%	62.5%
LL	2.14	24	11.21	24	11.21		LL/Total	32.5%	39.3%	37.5%

Cross+1	1.77	14	7.91	14	7.91		Cross+1/F2L	39.9%	37.8%	35.0%
OLS	1.37	16	11.68	17	12.41		OLS/Total	20.8%	26.2%	26.6%
PLL	1.21	14	11.57	14	11.57		PLL/LL		56.5%	58.3%	58.3%
U' B2 R2 U2 R2 U B' L' U L' F' R D L' B D' F2 U'

z // inspection
R2 D R2' F' // cross
U' R' U R U' L L' L U L' // 1st pair
U' L' U L y' U' L U L' // 2nd pair
d' R U R' y' R U R' // 3rd pair
y U R U' R' U2 R U2' R' // 4th pair
U R U R' U R U2' R' // OLL
U R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U // PLL
View at alg.cubing.net
B D2 B U2 R2 B' U2 F L' D' U R D L F2 L2 F2 L

x // inspection
r' U2 R2 D' R' D // cross
R' U' R U R' U2' R // 1st pair
U' L U L' // 2nd pair
U' L' U L d R U R' // 3rd pair
U2 R' U' R // 4th pair
F R U R' U' F' // EO
U R' U2' R U R' U R F U R U2' R' U R U R' F' // ZBLL
View at alg.cubing.net
Code:
[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	6.67	55	8.25	56	8.40	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
F2L	3.14	29	9.24	29	9.24		F2L/Total	47.1%	52.7%	51.8%
LL	3.53	26	7.37	27	7.65		LL/Total	52.9%	47.3%	48.2%

Cross+1	1.64	13	7.93	13	7.93		Cross+1/F2L	52.2%	44.8%	44.8%
OLS	3.70	30	8.11	31	8.38		OLS/Total	55.5%	54.5%	55.4%
ZBLL	1.90	17	8.95	18	9.47		ZBLL/LL		53.8%	65.4%	66.7%
B D2 B U2 R2 B' U2 F L' D' U R D L F2 L2 F2 L

x // inspection
r' U2 R2 D' R' D // cross
R' U' R U R' U2' R // 1st pair
U' L U L' // 2nd pair
U' L' U L d R U R' // 3rd pair
U2 R' U' R // 4th pair
F R U R' U' F' // EO
U U' U R' U' U' R U R' U R F U R U2' R' U R U R' F' // ZBLL
View at alg.cubing.net
D2 L2 U R2 U' B' D R B' F R2 D' U2 B2 R2 D L B2 L2

y x' // inspection
D F R D2 F // cross
U' L U' L' U' y R U' R' // 1st pair
y' U2 R U' R' L U' L' // 2nd pair
U R U R' U' L' U L // 3rd pair
(U R U' R')3 // 4th pair
U' F R U R' U' R U' R' U' R U R' F' // ZBLL
View at alg.cubing.net
Code:
[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	5.70	54	9.47	58	10.18	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
F2L	3.81	39	10.24	42	11.02		F2L/Total	66.8%	72.2%	72.4%
LL	1.89	15	7.94	16	8.47		LL/Total	33.2%	27.8%	27.6%

Cross+1	1.54	13	8.44	14	9.09		Cross+1/F2L	40.4%	33.3%	33.3%
OLS	2.57	12	4.67	12	4.67		OLS/Total	45.1%	22.2%	20.7%
ZBLL	1.01	13	12.87	13	12.87		ZBLL/LL		53.4%	86.7%	81.3%
D2 L2 U R2 U' B' D R B' F R2 D' U2 B2 R2 D L B2 L2

y x' // inspection
D F R D2 F // cross
U' L U' L' U' y R U' R' // 1st pair
d U R U' R' L U' L' // 2nd pair
U R U R' U' L' U L // 3rd pair
(U R U' R')3 // 4th pair
U U' U' F R U R' U' R U' R' U' R U R' F' // ZBLL
View at alg.cubing.net
Code:
Average (removing fastest and slowest solve)

[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	5.97	56	9.43	60	9.99	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
F2L	3.94	33	8.38	36	9.14		F2L/Total	66.0%	58.6%	60.3%
LL	2.03	23	11.48	24	11.64		LL/Total	34.0%	41.4%	39.7%

Cross+1	1.69	12	6.89	12	7.28		Cross+1/F2L	43.0%	35.4%	34.3%
OLS	1.82	15	8.04	15	8.41		OLS/Total	30.5%	26.0%	25.7%
PLL	1.15	16	13.87	16	13.87		PLL/LL		56.7%	68.6%	67.6%
Code:
Mean (5/5)

[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	6.03	55	9.12	58	9.65	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
F2L	3.70	31	8.27	33	9.02		F2L/Total	61.4%	55.6%	57.4%
LL	2.33	24	10.49	25	10.66		LL/Total	38.6%	44.4%	42.6%

Cross+1	1.58	11	6.96	11	7.22		Cross+1/F2L	42.7%	35.9%	34.1%
OLS	2.21	19	8.42	20	8.88		OLS/Total	36.6%	33.8%	33.7%
PLL	1.23	16	12.82	16	12.99		PLL/LL		53.0%	64.8%	64.5%
Code:
Best from each field

[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	5.55	51	9.57	56	10.18[/COLOR]

F2L	3.14	23	10.24	26	11.02
LL	1.89	15	14.98	16	14.98

Cross+1	1.18	7	8.44	7	9.09
OLS	1.37	12	11.68	12	12.41
PLL	0.80	13	17.50	13	17.50
• generally time measurements are taken from the end of the previous step to the end of the current step

Total is the total solve - timed from timer start to timer stop

F2L is the first two layers (including cross) - timed from timer start to end of 4th pair
LL is the last layer - timed from end of 4th pair to timer stop

Cross+1 is the cross and first pair (and/or Xcross) - timed from timer start to end of 1st pair
F2L-1 is the cross and first three pairs - timed from timer start to end of 3rd pair
OLS is the last slot (4th pair) and orientation of the last layer - timed from end of 3rd pair to end of OLL
PLL is the permutation of last layer - timed from the frame before the first move to the frame after the last move (does not include any pre- or post-AUF/rotations)

where applicable:
• ZBLL / OLLCP / EPLL / ELL stats replace PLL
• OLS stats include ZBLL / OLLCP / COLL (as this is when orientation is solved)
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
631
Likes
263
Location
New York
#48
HOLY! HE BLEW MAX PARK AWAY! Its so funny that there was a time were people thought this was impossible. WOW.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
951
Likes
263
Location
P(r)oland
WCA
2012SZEW01
YouTube
SajwoPL
#50
Should've done the lefty OLL on the 2nd solve and get a U perm instead of N perm, would've been a little faster?



But what do i know i avg 11 lul
Wouldn't change much, only 0.03s faster average.

Amazing achievement though, last solve was such a clutch. The moment he was calculating the average was so intense I almost sh*t myself.. even though I already knew it's a WR :D
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
951
Likes
263
Location
P(r)oland
WCA
2012SZEW01
YouTube
SajwoPL
#53
It seems that with this record he has reached Max's TPS. So now it is only Zemdegs' slightly more efficient solutions that gives him the advantage.
Feliks has an advantage of knowing several hundreds more algs and also being overally faster.:) You can't really compare their TPS basing on only 5 solves
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
432
Likes
409
#54
Feliks has an advantage of knowing several hundreds more algs and also being overally faster.:) You can't really compare their TPS basing on only 5 solves
By looking at recent reconstructions by both of them, it seems that those hundreds of algorithms result in roughly 2-3 less turns per solve, about a 3-5% less. And if you compare their recent average of averages, Zemdegs is around a 3% faster at the moment. I think their TPS are quite equal right now.
 

Brest

Super Reconstructor
Staff member
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
2,263
Likes
387
WCA
2011STUA01
YouTube
BrestCubing
#56
18.75 peak TPS, on a T perm. How is that even humanly possible?!
Re-checked this after your post and there was a miss-count. It's *only* 17.50 TPS on the Tperm.

Also of note, except for PLL (and ZBLL where applicable) the TPS for each step is measured from the end of the step before. For PLL I measure from the frame before the 1st turn to the frame after the last turn (no auf) so it's a measure of "burst" TPS.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
432
Likes
409
#57
18.75 peak TPS, on a T perm. How is that even humanly possible?!
I think it is wrong though, if you look at the first solve, you will see it was 17.5 TPS (still crazy). The "Best from each field" is calculating the TPS with the time of one permutation and the moves of another one, which doesn't make much sense.

@Brest is this intended to be like this?

EDIT: way too late!
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
432
Likes
409
#59
Only after Brest mentioned frames did I notice that Zemdegs has been recording and uploading his solves at 60 fps... It makes it amazing to watch at x0.25 speed. :eek:
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
405
Likes
66
WCA
2012THIE01
#60
Wut? Why did he do F R U' R' F on the fourth solve and then zbll? Why not just the OLL and then pll instead?
 
Last edited:
Top