Hexi
Member
xD Thank you... understand it now
Yeah.. but u can learn only CLL and it's still faster than guimond
Yeah.. but u can learn only CLL and it's still faster than guimond
Who said/wrote that?Yeah.. but u can learn only CLL and it's still faster than guimond
what's with the alots in peoples pics now?
that's just my opinion...
I'm pretty sure that the WR avg was with anti-CLL, which is slightly different.
Guimond is pretty freaking 2 look. And CLL is usually 2 look, an easy layer could make it 1.Cuz I can do guimond and it's 3-look method I think. And when CLL is only 1-2 look i think it's faster, because the "looks" take the most time.
So EG-1 pre CLL? Because normally in my Ortega solves a J perm bottom layer is fastest.it would take a lot longer to be useful this way.
if you learned eg-1 first, you can start using a system better than ortega after 42 algs. if you learned it this way you'd have to learn the whole thing before you could really start to get to grips with doing non ortega solves all the time.
So EG-1 pre CLL? Because normally in my Ortega solves a J perm bottom layer is fastest.