Christopher Mowla
Premium Member
I don't want to give the wrong idea here. I never said that this was even close to being move optimal, much less having as few moves as possible. I mentioned that this method is most likely more efficient for the nxnxn in general than it is when being applied to a small cube size like a 3x3x3. Again, perhaps this method can eventually be evolved to be more efficient than its current existence, but I can't make any promises on that.FMC isn't about being optimal. It's about having as few moves as possible, and that's what this method is for, right? If you could get 30 moves or less easily, it's great for FMC.
This method is more of a revolution in the style of solving rather than in the efficiency of solving.