PenguinsDontFly
Member
i thought your lse is like 2.5, doesn't look like you should be thanking me.
SLOW TURNING M8... I my lse is sub 3 with new turning....
i thought your lse is like 2.5, doesn't look like you should be thanking me.
https://alg.cubing.net/?setup=z2_y_...&title=alg.garron.us&alg=r_U2_r-_U-_M-_r_U_r-
this is also 8 moves, GuRoux indirectly showed me this
https://alg.cubing.net/?setup=z2_y_...&title=alg.garron.us&alg=r_U2_r-_U-_M-_r_U_r-
this is also 8 moves, GuRoux indirectly showed me this
i'd usually go with this advanced f2l alg: U2 R2 U2 R' U' R U' R2 or what you did.
Being new to Roux, I find it amazing how you can make your second block 15 moves or less in a speed solves despite tough cases like this.
most of the last pair cases are better than this one, and a few are just as or worse but are always fingertricky. 20 is a pretty good movecount for second block if you can do it. when you has most of the cases down efficiently and can lookahead better and thus influence the last part of second block while doing the first part, 15-16 doesn't seem to hard to believe. if you get any more hard cases, i'd be happy to give you my solutions.
In my first solution here, I found the second block really hard (okay, not hard but long). Any suggestions?
Hi, I have a question about CMLL. According to http://grrroux.free.fr/method/Step_3.html D3 is symmetrical to D2. However, after heavy searching, I can't find any D2 and D3 algorithms that are symmetrical. I've looked for example here:
http://wafflelikescubes.webs.com/cmllalgorithms.htm
https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?20355-CMLL
https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?20355-CMLL&p=847570&viewfull=1#post847570
If anyone can tell me which 2 algorithms are symmetrical I'd be grateful. It might mean 1 less alg for me to learn.
EDIT:
And the same for D5 being symmetrical to D4
So, I've been practicing mostly CFOP but recently, thought of the idea of if I just solved my F2B however I want, without any restrictions. So like F2L, I solve two cross edges, and then an f2l pair (right or left) and then solve another, but it can be on either side. Is this good if it works for me better than the other way (FB, SB)?
EDIT: forgot to mention that I just got a 21.99 second Roux solve doing it that way.
what ever is faster, but in the long run, yours will be more moves and with rotations, but of course perhaps easier fingertricks like f2l.
first sub 20
18.42
B2 D2 F L2 F2 L2 D2 F' U2 B2 R2 D' F2 L F R B2 L' B' F2
z y
F' D' U' R2 U2 F'//FB is all I remember lol
gj
zomg pbs are fun i wish i broke mine
gj
zomg pbs are fun i wish i broke mine
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | The "H" Method- A different Combination of Roux and CFOP | How-to's, Guides, etc. | 3 | |
CFOP vs ROUX | General Speedcubing Discussion | 12 | ||
[Member Intro] Yoooooooooooo I'm badatroux | Member Introductions | 8 | ||
G | I tried roux for 7 days | Puzzle Video Gallery | 0 | |
E | Roux CN discussion (x2/y vs full CN) | General Speedcubing Discussion | 22 |