• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Colour Neutral Deliberation

Kirjava

Colourful
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
6,121
WCA
2006BARL01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I spent some of today daydreaming about CN. With all the buzz about it these days I thought that I would commit my thoughts to the forum.

I find it quite funny how people say that CN is hard. Or that it's 'especially hard' with Roux. It's extremely easy to be CN, all you have to do is chose CN when you are starting.

Back in mid-2005 I was a CN petrus solver. I remember having a conversation with Paul Nixon, another UK cuber and petrus solver. He told me about how he was colour neutral, but would always extend his 2x2x2 so that his last layer was always either white or yellow. I couldn't understand why you would want to restrict yourself like that at the time.

So obviously at some point I'd switched to Roux. Gilles Roux advises to have yellow/white on L/R for better recognition of block colours. This also seems to help during LSE as tracking UL/UR pieces during EO (or CLLEO) is stupid easy. So I'd made my choice and I am now stuck with it.

I don't regret it.

I'm not convinced that CN is outright better than non-CN. Is my recognition better than it would've been if I'd've been CN? Maybe. I have less opportunity to build efficient blocks, but perhaps the effect is negligible. Perhaps I'm better at handling bad block configurations as I'm slightly more used to them.

Anyone wanting to refute the above points will be missing the point of what I was trying to say.

The thing that people find hard about CN is switching to it. This is something that people seem to think is always a good idea. People advocate switching as if it's accepted as a good thing to do. No fast cuber has ever switched to CN and surpassed his nonCN speed. (Fast is a relative term? Let's say sub10 for now.)

Switching is extremely hard, and will take you a long long time and a lot of effort. At faster speeds it hasn't even been shown to be possible. You may think that it is worth it, but I certainly do not. Why spend a year or more practising something that at very very best will give you some perceived advantage that may or may not exist when you could spend in on... actually getting faster?

The effort people are putting into CN is way higher than it's value.

This switching discussion applies mostly to people wanting to go from Fixed Cross -> Full CN. I think there are types of switching that are possible that require a lot less effort.

The modern BOY colour scheme helps faciliate this easier form of switching. With colours that are opposite to each other being 'similar', switching from something like fixed cross to dual cross because a lot easier than going to full CN due to only having to reverse colours.

I kind of did this very thing.

For the first few years of my Roux usage, while I would have either white or yellow on the side of my first block, the bottom would always be blue. About two years ago when I started messing with non-matching blocks I had started to make blocks with green on bottom, to allow myself to create pseudo blocks. I was quite bad at it at first, eventually getting to the point where I could sort of do solves on green at a similar sort of speed to blue on bottom. There's an average video of mine from a year ago where just a single solve was with green on bottom. However, OH is quite good for practising this, and I had switched to dual colour U/D in OH at this point that really helped me get used to it a lot. I then went through a period of starting to throw more and more green bottom solves into my 2H solves, occasionally messing up during F2B because my recog wasn't yet up to scratch. Time goes by and those problems are pretty much gone. I still have a slight blue bias, but I can execute solves on green with no problems. I realised that this had happend when I caught that I'd done it without even noticing until after I'd finished the solve.

Was it worth it? Eh. Sometimes I'll get a random fast solve from solving on an easy block I got used to.

That also happens when a case comes up that I learned an alg for in 2 mins.
 

Muesli

Premium Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
1,714
Location
Sheffield, UK
WCA
2009SMIT05
YouTube
Visit Channel
Exactly my thoughts on the matter. I'm only CN from simply getting bored of solving green-cross over and over. If I'd have used green-cross throughout my cubing career up to now, however, I don't think spending so much time trying to get CN would improve my times that much.
 

jskyler91

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
676
Location
Berkeley CA
YouTube
Visit Channel
Good points, but I think it is important to note that switching does not take anywhere near a year. If you do it by color pairs as you alluded to it should really only take 3-4 weeks assuming you don't give up. During this time I would advise either never solving white to make sure that you don't get back into the old habit or make sure that you inspect for longer times to make sure that you choose the best cross, not just the comfortable white one.
 

uberCuber

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,921
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
WCA
2011THOM01
Good points, but I think it is important to note that switching does not take anywhere near a year. If you do it by color pairs as you alluded to it should really only take 3-4 weeks assuming you don't give up.

I should think it would take longer than 3-4 weeks to truly become CN if you are already sub-10 with a fixed starting color.
 

jskyler91

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
676
Location
Berkeley CA
YouTube
Visit Channel
I should think it would take longer than 3-4 weeks to truly become CN if you are already sub-10 with a fixed starting color.

To be 100 percent comfortable with it yes, but to be capable enough to al least average the same as you do no. It all comes down to determination. If you do not let yourself slip up, you can change rather quickly.
 

Athefre

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
1,248
I started with blue corner Roux. Soon after, I switched to orange and would sometimes switch back to blue. With all of the time I spent testing non-matching, I gained early experience with the other two colors. That's not really an accomplishment, but I guess that's why, even though I'm probably considered slow at 15-16s, I don't notice a speed difference among any of those 8 blocks. Any other orientation would take me a long time to feel as comfortable. It doesn't seem worth it to switch now since I already very often find yellow or white pairs in scrambles.
 

waffle=ijm

Waffo
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
3,511
Location
Waffletopia
WCA
2008MANA02
YouTube
Visit Channel
I tried being white/yellow on L and R thanks to Richard Meyer and I was doing this for my early Roux solves. But thanks to the habit of white/yellow on D for a few months from Petrus and CFOP, I really couldn't achieve the times that I really wanted. So that's when I did white/yellow on U/D and neutral L/R. Not really regretting using doing this and I feel like I have more blocks to choose from. Looking back at it, I wish that I had gave white/yellow on L/R more chance for the sake of easy tracking, but I'd say that was a worthwhile "sacrifice (not really)" in able to have more blocks.
 

StachuK1992

statue
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
3,812
Location
West Chester, PA
WCA
2008KORI02
YouTube
Visit Channel
The difficulty of switching to CN from either one or opp-colored cross can be compared to going from a very very structured method such as CFOP to something where more intuition is needed.
Doing "always white cross" makes you stupid (I'll vouch for myself here) in terms of processing crosses on other colors, let alone F2L and LL
This is very similar to the profound difficulties in trying to switch from a 'stupid' method such as CFOP to Petrus, Roux, etc. Again, I'll vouch for myself.

It's much easier to go from unstructured and free systems to structured ones. It's part of your structured set. It doesn't work the other way around.

Sure, it might be possible, but you can in no way say it's easy and you can in no way say it's a matter of laziness.
It's a matter of me, Stachu, making myself 'stupid'/structured early on and having to deal with that now.


This is precisely why when I teach someone how to cube, I do so with Petrus or Roux. Force intuition.



Also, jsklyer, you're wrong.
 

Kirjava

Colourful
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
6,121
WCA
2006BARL01
YouTube
Visit Channel
To be 100 percent comfortable with it yes, but to be capable enough to al least average the same as you do no. It all comes down to determination. If you do not let yourself slip up, you can change rather quickly.

There's a diference between switching to colour neutral when you're slow and switching when you're fast. You have no idea how easy it is to switch to CN when you're fast, and I do not think that you should be dictating that you do.
 

jskyler91

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
676
Location
Berkeley CA
YouTube
Visit Channel
There's a diference between switching to colour neutral when you're slow and switching when you're fast. You have no idea how easy it is to switch to CN when you're fast, and I do not think that you should be dictating that you do.

Neither do you since you have never done it. I , at least, have tried and have attempted to share my triumphs with others rather than say you can't switch quickly.
 

Kirjava

Colourful
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
6,121
WCA
2006BARL01
YouTube
Visit Channel
You are the one making claims about the switching timeframe, so you need to have an idea, otherwise you're just making assumptions. This is the problem.

No one fast has ever switched to CN. If you could do it in a month, it is likely that it would've happened by now. Fast cubers have tried for months and months to switch to no avail.
 

jskyler91

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
676
Location
Berkeley CA
YouTube
Visit Channel
You are the one making claims about the switching timeframe, so you need to have an idea, otherwise you're just making assumptions. This is the problem.

No one fast has ever switched to CN. If you could do it in a month, it is likely that it would've happened by now. Fast cubers have tried for months and months to switch to no avail.

I have yet to find a single person who is fast and has actually spent months and months trying to switch. Most try for a few weeks and then give up (Weston) or only try half heartedly for a month and then give up. No one that I know of has ever taken the time to structure themselves a schedule and try to only focus on switching while not doing their main color as I have proposed. I think it is very possible even for those who are fast to switch if they do it right. I did not and do not claim that they can do it and be 100 percent in a month, but I do think they can get to the same times they are at now with all colors if they stick to it 100% and never falter. Please tell me of someone who has truly put in this much time and has not succeeded? The thing is not enough people have tried it to even make a statement like the one you are making. To say that it is impossible is just wrong. Hard yes, tedious yes, but impossible no.
 
Last edited:

jskyler91

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
676
Location
Berkeley CA
YouTube
Visit Channel
Don't make this thread get closed either... Or even lose your access to the private forum.

Why would MY access be closed? Kirjava started this up be quoting me and I am simply defending myself. Why is it that he can do whatever he likes and not be punished?

Yeah and Breandan probably didn't use my method to switch, I am certain he probably still solves yellow crosses which deters from his learning the filters.

EDIT: This discussion apparently needs to happen so let it, at least this thread is literally made for this type of discussion.
 
Last edited:

masterofthebass

Premium Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
3,923
Location
Denver, CO
WCA
2007COHE01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Why would MY access be closed? Kirjava started this up be quoting me and I am simply defending myself. Why is it that he can do whatever he likes and not be punished?

Yeah and Breandan probably didn't use my method to switch, I am certain he probably still solves yellow crosses.

EDIT: This discussion apparently needs to happen so let it, at least this thread is literally made for this type of discussion.

I'm just warning you two about petty bickering. The private forum is for uncluttered discussion.


Also... Breandan always used yellow cross exclusively, so of course he still solves it.
 

Kirjava

Colourful
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
6,121
WCA
2006BARL01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Yeah and Breandan probably didn't use my method to switch, I am certain he probably still solves yellow crosses.

He does not solve yellow crosses when practising CN.

There is nothing special about 'your method' to make it make months of difference. There is no reason why your 'changes' would make multiple months of practise take only a single month.
 

jskyler91

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
676
Location
Berkeley CA
YouTube
Visit Channel
I'm just warning you two about petty bickering. The private forum is for uncluttered discussion.

I completely agree, Kir and I will keep this civil, but we have very different views on this and I think we should discuss this in a forum with Color Neutral Deliberation as its title. I, for one, would like to hear his reasoning behind adamantly opposing me.
 

Escher

Babby
Joined
Jul 23, 2008
Messages
3,374
WCA
2008KINN01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Lol. Breandan usually practices untimed and generally only practices using fixed cross just before a competition. The rest of the time he solves with no colour bias at all, or without yellow.
 

jskyler91

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
676
Location
Berkeley CA
YouTube
Visit Channel
He does not solve yellow crosses when practising CN.

There is nothing special about 'your method' to make it make months of difference. There is no reason why your 'changes' would make multiple months of practise take only a single month.

For the reason that you allude to in your statement "he does not solve yellow crosses when practicing CN", the reason he doesn't succeed as quickly is because he still takes the time to practice yellow crosses and still practices yellow cross while trying CN solves. This type of practicing Color neutrality won't be conducive to quick switching. If a person where trying to stop drinking alcohol for good would you tell them to take a few swigs a day? No! Not if you ever wanted him to quit in a timely manner. This is the same thing as going CN, you need to stick to CN solves only to be successful. This is what my guide helps you to do. You only do one color, never your original color, at a time to develop those filters. It takes at least a month to do this properly.
 
Top