QJ Timer, More Accurate/Precise than SS Timer???

Was playing with my timer and managed this:

http://speedcubeuk.webs.com/DSCF0257.JPG

http://speedcubeuk.webs.com/DSCF0258.JPG

Does this mean it is more accurate/precise??

i have abosolutely no idea, because i dont own a stackmat. /

but that IS pretty accurate. i can't manage that on my keyboard. my record is 0.07

with stackmat i believe only 0.02 is possible

0.01 or 0.02 isn't a matter of accuracy. Speedstacks made it 0.02 to prevent some mis-stops.

That might not mean anything. It may prefer to stop at 0.01 on a bad start, similar to how the Speedstack Competition Timer prefers to stop at 0.02 on a bad start.

I think a good test is to stop each timer at close to 1.00 second (or some other time of your choosing), and see if it is unable to reach certain values after a hundred attempts. For example, you may find it easy to reach 1.00 or 1.02 but never 1.01. I never did this experiment. I am curious about the results.

andyt1992 said:

Does this mean it is more accurate/precise??

Click to expand...

Not at all.

rjohnson_8ball said:

I think a good test is to stop each timer at close to 1.00 second (or some other time of your choosing), and see if it is unable to reach certain values after a hundred attempts. For example, you may find it easy to reach 1.00 or 1.02 but never 1.01. I never did this experiment. I am curious about the results.

Click to expand...

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?p=190830#post190830
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?p=191128#post191128

What am I supposed to see? Those pictures don't fit on my screen.
=> [thread=19636]Photos: RESIZE, please[/thread]

StefanPochmann said:

What am I supposed to see? Those pictures don't fit on my screen.
=> [thread=19636]Photos: RESIZE, please[/thread]

Click to expand...

What browser are you using? It doesn't auto resize pictures when viewing them?

StefanPochmann said:

What am I supposed to see? Those pictures don't fit on my screen.
=> [thread=19636]Photos: RESIZE, please[/thread]

Click to expand...

maybe stop using opera? Good browsers scale the image for you. He didn't post it in the thread, so there shouldn't be an issue.

PatrickJameson said:

StefanPochmann said:

What am I supposed to see? Those pictures don't fit on my screen.
=> [thread=19636]Photos: RESIZE, please[/thread]

Click to expand...

What browser are you using? It doesn't auto resize pictures when viewing them?

Click to expand...

Regardless, it still took a long time to load. Saying "I got 0.01 on my qj timer) would have sufficed. I doubt anybody wouldn't believe him.

Opera, and at least in Firefox I've turned that off. Also, the resizing doesn't make the loading of 6MB any faster (which of course was my real point, as I am capable of resizing, we just shouldn't have to). This is the most extreme I've ever seen, as I can provide the same information in 22 characters:

QJ timer can stop 0.01

There.

StefanPochmann said:

Opera, and at least in Firefox I've turned that off. Also, the resizing doesn't make the loading of 6MB any faster. This is the most extreme I've ever seen, as I can provide the same information in 22 characters:

QJ timer can stop 0.01

There.

Click to expand...

[email protected]
13 characters.

miniGOINGS said:

StefanPochmann said:

Opera, and at least in Firefox I've turned that off. Also, the resizing doesn't make the loading of 6MB any faster. This is the most extreme I've ever seen, as I can provide the same information in 22 characters:

QJ timer can stop 0.01

There.

Click to expand...

[email protected]
13 characters.

Click to expand...

lol, Firefox thinks that's an email address.

miniGOINGS said:

StefanPochmann said:

Opera, and at least in Firefox I've turned that off. Also, the resizing doesn't make the loading of 6MB any faster. This is the most extreme I've ever seen, as I can provide the same information in 22 characters:

QJ timer can stop 0.01

There.

Click to expand...

[email protected]
13 characters.

Click to expand...

[email protected]

12 characters.

MichaelP. said:

[email protected]

12 characters.

Click to expand...

QJtmr @.01

10 characters.

miniGOINGS said:

MichaelP. said:

[email protected]

12 characters.

Click to expand...

QJtmr

@.01

10 characters.

Click to expand...

Uh, if you count pictures as characters, then the OP wins.

PatrickJameson said:

Uh, if you count pictures as characters, then the OP wins.

Click to expand...

But but but but this is clip art.

@.01

6 Characters.

Clip art =/= to characters, and anyway a pictures worth 1000 words, and just for the sake of it, lets say a word averages 5 letters. You have 10000 characters.

Accuracy is a totally different concept than precision...