Believe me, I could have posted a much worse comment quite easily. I thought his initial comment was perfectly fine.
Posting a little bit of my opinion, this video makes the Moyu cube look quite bad. Fortunately I know not to form my opinion based on it.
Awesome, can't wait to see what the...
Think I need 3. Feliks beats me at everything except Sq-1 single/average, clock average, skewb single, and multibld, and there is no single person who beats me at all of those
To clarify, the wikipedia numbers disregard tips, but the WCA limits do not.
But seriously, it's dumb for the limit to be set at a higher number than the current WR: For 2x2, the current WR is the entire reason why the number 4 is the limit. :rolleyes:
I believe 1/2^7 = 1/128 = 0.78%. (Each edge has two possible orientations, so 1/2 for each of 7 edges, and the 8th edge's orientation is defined by the other 7).
I would just work on whatever "feels" particularly bad to you, because my proportion seems to be waaay different than Pedro Roque's, since his 56.99 SAR (which is faster than my PB single) had cross+centers that would just be "okay" for me
J perm swaps adjacent corners and Y perm swaps opposite corners.
Lol more efficient? The the third and fourth and each one move longer than my normal OLL algs for those edges-oriented cases.
If a cap falls off a corner piece, then even though the cap itself only has one sticker, it is a piece with three stickers that is affected, and so I think it should be a DNF. I can't remember though. What is the actual definition of a "part" as used in 5b5?
This is just a general statement...
Here's a simple one to learn. (last layer on second page) Of course this way will take more moves than it will once you learn 16-alg 4-look last layer, but I'm sure you expect that already
COLL algs are also ZBLL algs, and it is actually a good idea to know a bunch of COLL before starting to learn ZBLL. There are 42 COLL cases. With a few exceptions because of symmetry, each one of those COLL cases has 12 different ZBLL cases associated with it. For example, the T orientation case...
There are actually over 30000.
But yeah, it's weird, it seems like a pretty negative portrayal for awhile, and then suddenly at the end he calls them all intelligent and says he wishes he was one of them.
I have no idea what that last statement even means, but... if something gets changed quietly, how is everyone supposed to know about it in order to present a counter-argument? When that recent sq-1 NR by Kunaal Parekh was turned into a DNF, if that change hadn't caught the eyes of some of us on...
Wait, some solves get DNF'd without any announcement, i.e. without any chance for anyone to present a counter-argument as to why the decision to DNF it might not have been correct? When has that happened?