I switched to Roux when I was bored with CFOP and wasn't progressing without learning algs and felt restricted with f2l. Roux also looked really cool with the m slices. So I feel that CFOP is "the best method" to people since it is very structured and you, in my opinion, do not get a decent...
Who thinks it would be a good idea or a possible idea to while maybe putting in a last pair when convenient to orient and permute the corners or is it impractical and outlandish?
I do say your math is wrong you would have to multiply the fractions for each skip. ZZ-CT is the least chance for a skip and the alg set for most are triggers. but thank you anyway.
Hello I am Jared from Washington and have been cubing for about a year. I currently solve with Roux and learning ZZ-CT. My PB is 38s with Roux and I can solve a 4x4. My one question is how do you get money to buy Cubes?
I don't know if this is the best place to ask this but only place I can find. On to the question on gyro ninjas website what do all the titles for the first two ttll sets mean? And what do the tsle section titles mean?
the main reason I was attracted to zz was the the ll skips chances are reduced but I liked Roux because it is very intuitive. So I guess I will practice both and see. Thank you for your advice.
Right now I am at a dilemma I currently use Roux and I want to learn ZZ-CT but the problem is I cant chose between the two so I was wondering if I could learn and get good with both or should I just stick with one get sub 20 then learn the other?
I know I am late to the party but I do highly recommend reading the thread on choosing a method because just that can make cubing way way more fun. I know CFOP and it's okay for me to solve on but once I discovered Roux I really had a lot of fun since it felt more my style so go out there and...