StachuK1992
statue
Enh.I never thought as ELS as fast, but CLS is definitely fast. I don't think I'm going to bother to learn it though. Maybe EJF2L.
For me, ELS is meh when intuitive, and decent when not.
CLS is just sexy, and fasts.
Enh.I never thought as ELS as fast, but CLS is definitely fast. I don't think I'm going to bother to learn it though. Maybe EJF2L.
Scramble:
R' L2 D B' F R D R D2 F R' D' R B2 U2 F' B2 R2 U' D2 F2 L U2 B2 U'
EOLine:
x2 y L' F L' B' D' F
LH F2L:
R2 U R L U' R U2 R U' L2
CP:
L U' R' U L'
F2l minus slot:
U R2 U' R2
ELS:
U R U' R'
CLS:
U2 R U2 R' U R U2 R' U2 R U R'
U-perm
Could you explain the purpose of MGLS, and what benefit it has? I don't see how it's an improvement over regular fridrich, and in fact it seems worse to me, plus it also has more algorithms than regular OLL.
I strongly considered learning this for OH and learned a bunch of algs for it. (Somewhere between 20-30. I don't really remember)
But I strayed away from it for two reasons.
1. I wanted to use COLL for OH since I was already learning CLL for 2x2 at the time
2. I realized that instead of spending time learning new algs, I could just spend that time practicing my OLLs, or learning a few new algs for bad cases.
I'm not saying that its bad idea to learn MGLS, but I just saw practicing OLLs as a better investment of my time instead of learning algs, and then getting them fast after that.
I do wish that I had learned MGLS instead of OLL though.
These kinda represent my thoughts. Right now, I care about OH more than anything else right now, as I haven't improved in 2H in forever.I strongly considered learning this for OH and learned a bunch of algs for it. (Somewhere between 20-30. I don't really remember)
But I strayed away from it for two reasons.
1. I wanted to use COLL for OH since I was already learning CLL for 2x2 at the time
2. I realized that instead of spending time learning new algs, I could just spend that time practicing my OLLs, or learning a few new algs for bad cases.
I'm not saying that its bad idea to learn MGLS, but I just saw practicing OLLs as a better investment of my time instead of learning algs, and then getting them fast after that.
I do wish that I had learned MGLS instead of OLL though.
I strongly considered learning this for OH and learned a bunch of algs for it. (Somewhere between 20-30. I don't really remember)
But I strayed away from it for two reasons.
1. I wanted to use COLL for OH since I was already learning CLL for 2x2 at the time
2. I realized that instead of spending time learning new algs, I could just spend that time practicing my OLLs, or learning a few new algs for bad cases.
I'm not saying that its bad idea to learn MGLS, but I just saw practicing OLLs as a better investment of my time instead of learning algs, and then getting them fast after that.
I do wish that I had learned MGLS instead of OLL though.
Oh yes, here's how I imagine my solves once I'm done with CLS:OH using ZZ+MGLS can be very sexy though...2gen+2gen+some more 2gen
EO. May require a rotation for efficiency.
I do my line separate, because I'm a nub, during F2L, and it requires no rotation.No rotations is great, but I don't think all of those algs are worth it. Besides, you will probably rotate during EO line.
I do EO by itself.how do you solve after your EO line? do you insert edges and do f2l or blockbuild? just curious.
http://cube.garron.us/MGLS/I cannot find an easy list of any of the CLS algorithms, does anybody know a good source? And also, ELS can be shortened to only 16 algorithms using the fairly intuitive connected cases of VHF2L
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
H | ZZ-CT vs MGLS-Z | Cubing Help & Questions | 6 | |
MGLS vs WV | General Speedcubing Discussion | 9 | ||
MGLS-F vs. Full Fridrich? | General Speedcubing Discussion | 22 | ||
S | [Unofficial] statue - 13.22 MGLS single | Puzzle Video Gallery | 7 | |
MGLS: Now with pronunciation! | General Speedcubing Discussion | 28 |