Shiv3r
Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2016
- Messages
- 800
- Location
- San Diego or thereabouts
- WCA
- 2016LEWI04
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
yes, true.
2swap in back (these are just <RU> solutions):
CW: (U) R U R' U2 R U R' (7)
ACW: (U') R U' R' U2 R U' R' (7)
O: R2 U R2 U R2 U2 R2 (7)
2swap on left (these are just y' then <RU> solutions):
CW: (y' U) R' U R U2 R' U R (7)
ACW: (y' U') R' U' R U2 R' U' R (7)
O: (y') R2 U' R2 U' R2 U2 R2 (7)
UFL -> URF:
CW: [L D' L' : U] (7)
ACW: (y U') [L D L' : U] (7)
O: (y U2) R U' L2 U R' U' L2 (7)
UBR -> URF:
CW: (U) [R' D' R : U'] (7)
ACW: (y) [R' D R : U'] (7)
O: (U2) L' U R2 U' L U R2 (7)
ULB -> URF:
CW: (U2) [R' D' R : U2] (7)
ACW: (y U2) [L D L' : U2] (7)
O: (U2) u R2 u' F u R2 u' F' (8)
or (R' F R F')*3 (12)
or (U2) R' D' U2 R U R' U D R (9)
no motion:
CW: (U) R U R2 D' r U2 r' D R (9)
ACW: (U') R' D' r U2 r' D R2 U' R' (9)
O: R U R' U2 R U2 L U' R' U L' (11)
*note all the ACW single motion cases begin from a y rotation
recog for CPLS is one of the reasons no one uses it.I really want to learn this but the recognition makes no sense i get the example that stacchu did, but when I try any other case it doesn't make sense. could you show how to recognize cpls with this setup: t perm triple sexy?
I really want to learn this but the recognition makes no sense i get the example that stacchu did, but when I try any other case it doesn't make sense. could you show how to recognize cpls with this setup: t perm triple sexy?
sorry for not understanding this claearly, but is cpls inserting the edge and then inserting the f2l corner and cp, or is it doing cp and then doing the ls like normal?
Relationships | Swap |
---|---|
Forward, Forward | No Swap |
Forward, Jump | Swap on Right |
Backward, Backward | Diagonal Swap |
Backward, Jump | Swap on Left |
Jump, Forward | Swap in Front |
Jump, Backward | Swap in Back |
Yes! 2GLL would be a great subset of ZBLL to learn, especially for OH. Over time you'll get used to recognizing when you have solved CP, so that shouldn't be an issue either.Is it worth it to learn full or near full 2GLL to take advantage of it (like you would do with COLL) in a CFOP solve? The algs are generally short and fast and the only problem I can see is CP recognition. What do you think?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
I need 2GLL algs | Cubing Help & Questions | 2 | ||
What should I learn before 2GLL? | Cubing Help & Questions | 1 | ||
E2CR2 Method proposal | A method for OH solving | General Speedcubing Discussion | 22 | ||
Is 2GLL worth it? | Cubing Help & Questions | 6 | ||
L | Full CPLS | Cubing Help & Questions | 11 |