Julian
Member
12.16, (9.50), 12.30, 11.80, 10.97, 12.81, 12.06, (12.83+), 10.50, 10.58, 11.25, 11.56 = 11.60
Would have been 11.40 without the +2.
Would have been 11.40 without the +2.
Dino cube:
(Actually done a few days ago)
5.14 Single
10.39 Average of 5
12.01 Average of 12
15.60 Average of 100
Anyone know UWRs? I don't think i'm close as this is so easy to solve. The actual puzzle turns pretty bad though :/
http://www.speedcubing.com/records
Apparently it is still 5.84 from 2009, but I doubt that is still the UWR.
Still single doesn't really matter on puzzles that take a short amount of time to solve.
First sub-30 avg of 5:
(40.83), 29.60, (22.43), 27.81, 28.77=28.73
Using ZZ? Nice!
PB Single, Average of 5, and Average of 12 with roux for me.
19.23/23.70/26.73
(34.01), 28.27, 26.03, 26.27, 23.84, (19.38), 31.11, 20.98, 26.66, 29.31, 25.66, 29.20
3x3? Pyraminx? Square-1? OH is sub15 now, so the 9.53 doesn't matter either then I guess.
What I mean, Is that single doesn't matter on puzzles that you can get insanely easy scrambles/solutions on. 2x2 obviously would be one of them and Pyraminx too. My 5.14 was an "LL" skip IIRC. So what I'm saying is that lucky times are not as important as averages.