Loser
Member
What does eg stand for
If you want a faster method then Ortaga then CLL is the best option for you to start with. There are 40 algs to learn for CLL (same with EG-1 and EG-2) but once you know full CLL you can get sub 4 pretty easy.Recently, I've learned Ortega and I'm pretty happy with the times it gets me. However, I'd like to learn another method - one that's faster but doesn't require a ton of algorithms, like [the amount of algs in] EG. I've been considering CLL, but would that really be my best option?
As cubeshepard said, CLL is what you should learn. Probably around 25% of the Algs you will already know from 3x3 or 2x2. CLL is also part of the EG method, one of the 3 sets. Start focusing on efficient layers during the transition, and experiment with new ways to build layers in fewer movesRecently, I've learned Ortega and I'm pretty happy with the times it gets me. However, I'd like to learn another method - one that's faster but doesn't require a ton of algorithms, like [the amount of algs in] EG. I've been considering CLL, but would that really be my best option?
Yeah! I'm feeling up to the challenge. Though I do know that you earn some seconds in the middle of learning how to recognize cases and execute them. When I learned the two Ortega algs for PBL, I think I gained five seconds, and those were just two algs. 37 more algs would be a lot. But hopefully I'll get better in the long run.@LightFlame_
At that speed it entirely up to you. If your serious about getting near 3 seconds or sub 3, go for CLL. If 2x2 isnt one of your favorite events now, no sense in learning it. I learned about 5.5 seconds with LBL to CLL. CLL will take time to learn, but if your willing to learn it, go for it. If you have any problems with algs or fingertricks, PM me. I would use the "Best 2x2 Algs" doc for algs.
Thanks for the spreadsheet! I usually get my algs from all sorts of places. It's convenient that now I have two major sources of algs- AlgDB and the spreadsheet.https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...MxiMX9a506JeAcLnUXZr8FgXAY/edit#gid=653202178
Yup, sorry. Would have linked this. But was on mobile on time.