1. Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 30,000+ people from around the world today!
    Dismiss Notice

Older cubers discussions

Discussion in 'General Speedcubing Discussion' started by MarcelP, Jun 22, 2012.

  1. pglewis

    pglewis Member

    971
    1,468
    Sep 23, 2016
    Cincinnati
    WCA:
    2016LEWI07
    I've done enough solves with the Yuxin HuangLong M stickerless to give my final take on it.

    Shades: definitely my favorite shades of all the stickerless 3x3 I've tried. Full stop.

    Magnets: a bit strong for my taste for 3x3, I prefer the weaker feel of the mass produced GTS2M. But I like it for 3bld, I still execute somewhat slowly and like the confidence the stronger magnets give me.

    Speed: yes it's fast but a well maintained GTS2M tuned for speed is faster IMO, or at least feels like there is less turning resistance. I'd say it's on par with my magnetic Valk 3 stickerless.

    After about a week and a half I did a full disassembly, wipe down, and tune up. I decided to take the corner ball-bearing weights out at that time* and try it without them and I think I like it better without the weights. I introduced the extra variable of having just cleaned and lubed it at the same time though, jury is still out. I'm definitely back to the GTS2M for 3x3, still the reining champ for my tastes, but the HunagLong is a great puzzle and I consider it main-worthy. Like my Valk 3, I expect it to get plenty of use just for a change of pace here and there.

    * I recommend putting down a towel or something to catch the small elusive bearings that will try to escape
     
    SpartanSailor and muchacho like this.
  2. pglewis

    pglewis Member

    971
    1,468
    Sep 23, 2016
    Cincinnati
    WCA:
    2016LEWI07
    On the topic of hand-scrambling: when I don't use generated scrambles (often if I'm watching TV and just spamming) I like to enter "opposite land" for part of my scramble. Just before I'm about make a turn I do the opposite of what I was about to do. I try to mimic what the random state scramblers usually do, with a fair number of 180 turns in the first half. But truly random is hard.
     
  3. Old Tom

    Old Tom Member

    73
    131
    Oct 16, 2014
    Virginia
    In duplicate bridge (I'm very involved in that, don't get me started, wrong forum anyway) there is a great deal of discussion, data and controversy concerning random deals v hand deals. But most agree that random deals seem to be "weirder" than hand deals. The statisticians insist that this weirdness is illusory, that hand deals skew towards "flatter" and more boring distributions. I wonder if there is any data on cube scrambling. Seems to me it would be very hard to gather and analyze.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
    SpartanSailor and pglewis like this.
  4. SpartanSailor

    SpartanSailor Member

    484
    664
    May 21, 2016
    WCA:
    2016DUEH02
    Interesting point about stronger magnets for blind. I tend to like stronger magnets, but am also an avid GTS2M fan. I may have to give this Yuxin a shot.
     
  5. mark49152

    mark49152 Super Moderator Staff Member

    4,421
    2,788
    Oct 29, 2012
    UK
    WCA:
    2015RIVE05
    YouTube:
    mark49152
    There is data on random state scrambles versus random move scrambles. That means genuinely random moves, which would exclude the biases that might occur with hand scrambles.

    I can't find it right now, but from memory I think it showed that a sequence of random moves needs to be at least 40 long before the distribution of good/bad edges converges on what you would get with random state scrambles.
     
    Jason Green and SpartanSailor like this.
  6. SpartanSailor

    SpartanSailor Member

    484
    664
    May 21, 2016
    WCA:
    2016DUEH02
    I remember something about 50 random moves. But I have no idea where I got that. So... if I do handscramble I just do random turns for a minute or so...
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
    Old Tom likes this.
  7. mark49152

    mark49152 Super Moderator Staff Member

    4,421
    2,788
    Oct 29, 2012
    UK
    WCA:
    2015RIVE05
    YouTube:
    mark49152
    There are three levels.

    1. Random state = ideal in terms of both distribution and length.

    2. Random moves = requires 40+ moves to converge on an even distribution.

    3. Hand scramble = pseudo-random moves with patterns introduced from muscle memory, possibly resulting in bias. 50 moves would probably be enough but who knows what biases are introduced by muscle memory. I'm not aware of any empirical study on that.

    Anyway, for practical purposes, it doesn't really matter for home practice as long as the cube isn't half solved or showing the same patterns each time. IMHO the most important things to do in a hand scramble are (1) toss with spin half way through, and (2) avoid looking at it so you're not tempted to make it "more random" by breaking colour blocks. If you do those two things I suspect even 25-30 moves would be enough.
     
    Selkie, pglewis and SpartanSailor like this.
  8. JanW

    JanW Member

    482
    875
    Oct 20, 2015
    WCA:
    2018WANA01
    I would very much agree with this. Many people have mentioned scrambling it some more if there are cross pieces solved or such. I think that's bad, because you also need to get used to solving the easy crosses. I still feel extra pressure whenever cstimer gives me a super easy cross, because I see the opportunity for a super fast solve, possibly even a new PB. It's not as bad as it used to be. When I first started doing timed solves I always messed up the easy crosses. Only by doing more easy crosses you'll eventually get used to solving with the extra pressure caused by high expectations.
     
    pglewis and SpartanSailor like this.
  9. SpartanSailor

    SpartanSailor Member

    484
    664
    May 21, 2016
    WCA:
    2016DUEH02
    I still “ruin” a great opportunity when an easy cross solution presents during timed sessions...
     
    JanW, pglewis and Mike Hughey like this.
  10. phreaker

    phreaker Member

    295
    355
    Mar 18, 2016
    I know the feelings on an "easy cross" when I see an easy EOLine. "Ok, I can fully plan this line, and it is really smooth." Ironically, my current PB was set with 8 bad edges to start. I've only once seen the mythical 0 edges, and seen the awful 12, a few times.

    I placed a few orders in the last few days:

    A 2 solution lenticular set of stickers, a fade a black lenticular set, and a calendar set + 3 MF3RS2s to go with them.

    The rest is all real speed cubes:

    Gan 354M (I really think this is my OH main to be, the 356s can just feel a hair large, and I prefer stickerless.)
    Gan 460M (I like Gan cubes... what can I say?)
    Huanglong M (And Yuxin)
    Shadow M (And Qiyi... sometimes. I'm hoping this isn't a disappointment.)
    Weilong GTS3

    Well, back to work on BLD. I'm a bit concerned on the Gan cubes that I won't be able to use them for BLD due to logos. :(
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2018
    pglewis likes this.
  11. pglewis

    pglewis Member

    971
    1,468
    Sep 23, 2016
    Cincinnati
    WCA:
    2016LEWI07
    I still need to get on the ball and start doing at least one daily 2-cube blind attempt. I'm reasonably confident I can get 2/2 under 20mins, 10 mins per cube should be plenty of time for solid memo for me now. Just the usual issue of splitting time when I have a lot of 3x3 work going on right now.

    My fight to get a sub 25 Ao50 continues to be silly. Yesterday's episode: a PB running Ao25 of 23.65 but still landed mid 25 due to tanking the final dozen solves. The session included a shoulda-been 17.55 full step that was a +2... still landed sub 20 lol. Small victories though, a mid :23 Ao25 is the longest I've ever managed to command decent lookahead and during that spell it felt like I had to screw up to end up with anything above 23.
     
    SpartanSailor likes this.
  12. phreaker

    phreaker Member

    295
    355
    Mar 18, 2016
    I'll admit... What comes to mind when one sees 3 identical cubes in front of them. (Yes, I'm going to stickermod them, but I'm waiting until I get the GTS3M in, to actually set them up properly.) 3/3 MBLD of course! But it is SO strange going from my Gan SUM to the Mf3RS2, for BLD. I'm not sure I have a success on a non-magnetic cube yet. :/
     
    pglewis likes this.
  13. newtonbase

    newtonbase Premium Member

    2,904
    2,613
    Jan 4, 2014
    MK, UK
    WCA:
    2015ADAM03
    YouTube:
    newtonbase
    I always make hand scrambles difficult. I throw, spin between my fingers on opposite corners and break up anything that looks easy. But, I only ever use generated scrambles on timed solves (I only time blind) as I couldn't count a PB on a hand scramble.
    I haven't done any big blind since finding out I couldn't make the UKs as I was too down about it but I've now found out that the holiday that got on the way has fallen through. Not only do I get to go but I've got brownie points for agreeing to miss it!
     
    h2f, mark49152, pglewis and 1 other person like this.
  14. pglewis

    pglewis Member

    971
    1,468
    Sep 23, 2016
    Cincinnati
    WCA:
    2016LEWI07
    Very promising day one despite 0/2 with more mistakes than are worth mentioning. 12:26 (7:00/5:25). Didn't bother with review but I had plenty of time if I wanted to. Actually quite surprised with the time.
     
    SpartanSailor likes this.
  15. newtonbase

    newtonbase Premium Member

    2,904
    2,613
    Jan 4, 2014
    MK, UK
    WCA:
    2015ADAM03
    YouTube:
    newtonbase
    Well done. That's maybe 15 mins with a review (execution would be faster). I'm seeing the potential for 5 or 6 in an hour if you get a chance for a full attempt.
     
    SpartanSailor likes this.
  16. pglewis

    pglewis Member

    971
    1,468
    Sep 23, 2016
    Cincinnati
    WCA:
    2016LEWI07
    I'm signed up for Michigan in about a month, thus getting off my butt to practice. I'm currently thinking 2 or 3 for my first attempt, I'd kinda like to stay well within what I think I can get 100% success on and I'm feeling like 3 might be my limit at the moment. Obviously time isn't a bottleneck and today's major issues were mostly execution, which is the easiest problem to fix so we'll see, I may be underestimating. I have enough locations for 8 cubes so plenty of room for growth in that dept.
     
  17. SpartanSailor

    SpartanSailor Member

    484
    664
    May 21, 2016
    WCA:
    2016DUEH02
    I wouldn’t count a PB off a hand-scramble either... just doesn’t seem right. I DO think I have reasonably random starting conditions, but I would never know if I had a bias during a hand scramble and so wouldn’t count it. In fact, I don’t even time when I’m just practing with handscrambles.... I mean, if I had a timer handy, I’d use it to generate scrambles too.
     
  18. SpartanSailor

    SpartanSailor Member

    484
    664
    May 21, 2016
    WCA:
    2016DUEH02
    I haven’t even tried another MBLD attempt since last week when I got 2/4. For the weekly, I’ll give 3 cubes a shot with a goal of 1 pt (2/3), which would be an improvement over my 0 pts (2/4) last week. But, I haven’t made the time yet to do that. Hopefully by the time I get a legit/official attempt at MBLD I will have a reasonable shot at 3/3 or 3/4. There’s NOTHING on my local comp schedule with MBLD that I am able to attend... there’s a Pennsylvania comp, but I don’t think I’ll be able to make that one. Otherwise, I’ll be on the lookout. I DO plan to talk with the delegates/organizers this weekend about a BLD featured event somewhere on the East Coast of the States—preferrably in Virginia or Maryland so I can make it.
     
    mark49152, Mike Hughey and pglewis like this.
  19. Mike Hughey

    Mike Hughey Super Moderator Staff Member

    9,228
    1,095
    Jun 7, 2007
    Indianapolis
    WCA:
    2007HUGH01
    YouTube:
    MikeHughey1
    I wish I could go to Michigan, but it's looking like I'm just not going to be able to make it to that one. :-( Good luck there - it should be an awesome competition!
     
    pglewis and SpartanSailor like this.
  20. SpartanSailor

    SpartanSailor Member

    484
    664
    May 21, 2016
    WCA:
    2016DUEH02
    Any of my fellow oldies have the Megaminx V2M from Xman? I am not really into Megaminx, but when I do get on a run, I get a little frustrated with the different edges moving when not desired. My guess is that the magnets would be beneficial much like in 4x4, 5x5 and 6x6. I have found that having magnets in bigger cubes has made a huge difference in my enjoyment to solve them (timed or slowly just for fun). Mis-aligned layers and related lockup’s are just not enjoyable.

    My question is whether or not the Magentic version is worth the cost?
     

Share This Page