jfly
Member
Sorry about that, blame my phone. Just curious, why don't you want to release the source?
Sorry about that, blame my phone. Just curious, why don't you want to release the source?
Can you add a BLD solve type under the 3x3-5x5 cubes?
25 random should be sufficient for an mobil app. I don't see any need for 2-3 move shorter random state scrambles.
This isn't about scramble length.
People shouldn't be writing their own mediocre scrambles when others have spent a long time thinking about how to generate proper scrambles *and have made their code available for others to use*. Given that there are enough good timers that use decent scrambles, I would never recommend anyone use a timer with its own (clueless) custom scrambles.
This isn't about scramble length.
People shouldn't be writing their own mediocre scrambles when others have spent a long time thinking about how to generate proper scrambles *and have made their code available for others to use*. Given that there are enough good timers that use decent scrambles, I would never recommend anyone use a timer with its own (clueless) custom scrambles.
This timer looks very promising! I don't mind the ads, because I'm off of wifi most of the time. One suggestion would be to be able to customize the "Solve Type" section, because not all of us use CFOP.
Indeed, I fixed that a few days ago. The next version will use "RA of" instead of "Mean of".Your mean shows actually the avg, and the avg shows the mean.
Oh, I guess this is what happens when one doesn't read the whole post before commenting Lol. I'll go try that outYou can edit solve types, add yours, remove CFOP or add your own steps if you want. CFOP is just the default one to show how it works and because most people use that.
It's all in the options screen (open menu from main screen and select options). There's a "solve types" section there.
Yes a few persons already asked about this. I already added it to the OP (not the procedure, but the fact that it's possible to do it) after the second requestOh, I guess this is what happens when one doesn't read the whole post before commenting Lol. I'll go try that out
Lol just read the whole thread, and you answered my question twice before. Maybe you could include it in the original post so you don't get asked again... Now I just got to figure how to have the inspection without my hand on the timer...
Good idea. How would you recommend using the steps part, like stopping the timer for a step. Wouldn't it ruin your lookahead?Yes a few persons already asked about this. I already added it to the OP (not the procedure, but the fact that it's possible to do it) after the second request
I'm planning to make it clearer in my app by adding a special "Add more solve types" line in the solve types selection dialog to directly link to the page to edit them. That way people will not be able to miss it. An option will also be added to hide that line for those who don't want to see it (still accessible via the options anyway).
When i use the steps timer i generally have my phone laying on the table in front of me and i cube next to it (like slightly above) and then i simply push anywhere on the screen at the end of each step. You don't really need to look at the phone for that as you can click anywhere on the screen and it will work. The times with steps might be slightly slower due to the time it takes to move your hand to the phone, but i don't think the difference is that big. And you have to do it for each step anyway, so the additional time is balanced among them.Good idea. How would you recommend using the steps part, like stopping the timer for a step. Wouldn't it ruin your lookahead?
Ok makes sense... nanotimer is now one of my main timersWhen i use the steps timer i generally have my phone laying on the table in front of me and i cube next to it (like slightly above) and then i simply push anywhere on the screen at the end of each step. You don't really need to look at the phone for that as you can click anywhere on the screen and it will work. The times with steps might be slightly slower due to the time it takes to move your hand to the phone, but i don't think the difference is that big. And you have to do it for each step anyway, so the additional time is balanced among them.
I'm glad to hear thatOk makes sense... nanotimer is now one of my main timers
Sure, i just tested and i can see how that could happen. I'll add that to next release.I would be great, if you can't immediately start the next solve after stopping. I have to delete a lot of solves, because I sometimes stop with two fingers and the second one accidentally starts a new solve.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
S | Timer on Competition page | Forum Competitions | 3 | |
I | [Unofficial] Nano Cube Blind 7:14 | Puzzle Video Gallery | 5 | |
Upcoming Maru Mini 3x3 (Maru Nano Cube) | General Speedcubing Discussion | 15 | ||
M | trade ipod nano 4th gen 8gb. for a few cubes. | Off-Topic Discussion | 3 | |
Nanominx design | Hardware Area | 4 |