• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Official] 3x3x3 Solve - 5.86 by Feliks Zemdegs

Feliks Zemdegs - 5.86 3x3 single - Melboure Summer 2014

[youtubehd]zTlaYSziJrU[/youtubehd]
B D2 R2 B L2 F2 D2 L2 U2 R' D2 U L2 R' D2 B F2 D R U'

x2 // inspection
D R' F U' L2' D2 // cross
L' U L U R U R2' U' R // 1st / 2nd pairs
y' U R U R' U R U' R' // 3rd pair
y' U2 R U R' U R' F R F' // 4th pair
R' U' R U' R' U2 R // OLL
R U' R' U' R U R D R' U' R D' R' U2' R' U // PLL
View at alg.garron.us
Code:
[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	5.86	55	9.39	59	10.07	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
Cross+1	1.61	13	8.07	13	8.07		Cross+1/F2L	44.1%	40.6%	37.1%
F2L	3.65	32	8.77	35	9.59		F2L/Total	62.3%	58.2%	59.3%
LL	2.21	23	10.41	24	10.86		LL/Total	37.7%	41.8%	40.7%
B D2 R2 B L2 F2 D2 L2 U2 R' D2 U L2 R' D2 B F2 D R U'

x2 // inspection
D R' F U' L2' D2 // cross
L' U L U R U R2' U' R // 1st / 2nd pairs
y' U R U R' U R U' R' // 3rd pair
U y' U R U R' U R' F R F' // 4th pair
R' U' R U' R' U2 R // OLL
R U' R' U' R U R D R' U' R D' R' U' U' R' U // PLL
View at alg.garron.us
 
Stupid question, but how does Brest know what the exact scramble is? Does he just choose a scramble that will result in the same state?
 
Scrambles are provided for every WCA competition. All Brest has to do is get the scramble and then do the reconstruction. (But it's probably a little more complicated than that)
 
So many fullstep sub-6s. Yet so few sub-5.55s :p
First sup-10 TPS I've seen from him. I knew he could do it though, didn't he have a 9.99 ETPS solve in his WR average?

I don't think so. It was high 9 but not 9.99.

Gratz faz. Soon we'll have to make a sub-6 compilation instead of sub-7.
 
So many fullstep sub-6s. Yet so few sub-5.55s :p
First sup-10 TPS I've seen from him. I knew he could do it though, didn't he have a 9.99 ETPS solve in his WR average?

I think he had one in his 7.49 average.
 
Back
Top