[NAR] Andrew Nelson Square-1 13.35 average Caltech 2012 (solves 3-5)

blade740 · Nov 18, 2012

14.88, (10.65), 12.05, (16.43), 13.11 = 13.35

Unfortunately, no video of the first 2 solves (as far as I know?)

Scrambles:
1. (0, 5) / (1, 4) / (-1, -4) / (4, 1) / (-4, -1) / (3, -3) / (4, 1) / (-4, 3) / (0, -3) / (-2, -1) / (0, 2) / (-1, -2) / (0, 4) / (-2, -1)
2. (0, -1) / (4, 1) / (-1, 2) / (0, 3) / (0, -3) / (1, 4) / (3, 0) / (-4, -1) / (-3, -2) / (3, 0) / (1, 0) / (-2, 0) / (2, 0) / (-2, 0) / (1, 0) / (-3, 0)
3. (-3, -1) / (1, -5) / (-1, 2) / (1, 4) / (2, -1) / (6, 0) / (3, 0) / (1, -2) / (5, -1) / (0, 1) / (-3, -3) / (-2, -1) / (-4, -2) /
4. (3, -1) / (-5, 4) / (6, 0) / (3, 0) / (-3, 0) / 0, 3) / (6, 3) / (-4, 3) / (-3, 0) / (-2, -1) / (0, -3) / (0, -4)
5. (6, -1) / (-5, 1) / (2, -1) / (0, -3) / (-5, 1) / (-1, 2) / (1, -2) / (-1, -4) / (0, 1) / (6, 0) / (-3, 0) / (-5, -4) / (-3, -4) / (0, 3) / (0, -4)

ottozing · Nov 18, 2012

Congratulations

qqwref · Nov 18, 2012

I think you beat Piotr Michal Padlewski

Great stuff.

Dene · Nov 18, 2012

onice. I see you look the same from behind as you always did

Petro Leum · Nov 18, 2012

wtf speed inspection.

brandbest1 · Nov 18, 2012

Petro Leum said:
wtf speed inspection.

lol cubeshape only requires a 1 second inspection

Lid · Nov 18, 2012

Congrats, those scrambles where not too hard

brandbest1 · Nov 18, 2012

Lid said:
Congrats, those scrabmes where not too hard

I lol'ed at the second scramble a bit.

JustinJ · Nov 18, 2012

Congrats!

Tong Haiwu · Nov 18, 2012

Re: Andrew Nelson Square-1 NAR average Caltech 2012 (solves 3-5)

Very nice

Petro Leum · Nov 18, 2012

brandbest1 said:
lol cubeshape only requires a 1 second inspection

im a noob at sq1, but why shouldnt one use the rest of inspection time to plan ahead? since cubeshape is more like recognizing a specific case im sure its possible to predict some stuff.

Crazycubemom · Nov 18, 2012

CONGRATS Andrew. Keep it up

blade740 · Nov 19, 2012

Petro Leum said:
im a noob at sq1, but why shouldnt one use the rest of inspection time to plan ahead? since cubeshape is more like recognizing a specific case im sure its possible to predict some stuff.

Unless the cubeshape is very easy (1-2 moves, for me), it takes too much time to trace where the corners are going to be afterwards, so there's really not much point in trying to recognize anything else. Unless you're Mike Hughey.

mmMarco17 · Nov 21, 2012

Happy birthday!

Brest · Feb 6, 2013

Andrew Nelson - 13.35 NAR Square-1 av5 - Caltech Fall 2012

1st solve - 14.88

2nd solve - 10.65

(-3,-1) / (1,-5) / (-1,2) / (1,4) / (2,-1) / (6,0) / (3,0) / (1,-2) / (5,-1) / (0,1) / (-3,-3) / (-2,-1) / (-4,-2) /

z2 - inspection
/ (4,2) / (-2,-1) / (3,3) / - CS
(0,-4) / - CO
(-2,4) / (3,0) / (3,0) / (-1,-1) / (-3,0) / (-3,0) / - EO
(0,1) / (-3,-3) / (0,3) / (-3,-3) / (0,3) / (-3,-3) / - CP
(1,3) / (-1,-1) / (-3,0) / (1,1) / (-3,0) / (-1,-1) / (0,1) - EP

Code:

[B]Step	Time	HTM	tps[/b]
[COLOR="red"]Total	12.05	58	4.81	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
					Step	Time	HTM[/B]
shape	1.74	10	5.75		shape	14.4%	17.2%
orient	4.14	16	3.86		orient	34.4%	27.6%
recog	1.29				recog	10.7%
permute	4.88	32	6.56		permute	40.5%	55.2%

(3,-1) / (-5,4) / (6,0) / (3,0) / (-3,0) / (0,3) / (6,3) / (-4,3) / (-3,0) / (-2,-1) / (0,-3) / (0,-4)

z2 - inspection
(-2,0) / (2,0) / (-2,3) / (-3,0) / (-3,0) / - CS
(3,-4) / (4,7) / - CO
(-3,6) / (3,0) / (-1,-1) / (-3,0) / - EO
(-2,3) / (0,-3) / (0,3) / (0,-3) / (0,3) / (-4,-2) / (-3,0) / (3,3) / (0,3) / (0,6) / (0,6) - PBL

Code:

[B]Step	Time	HTM	tps[/b]
[COLOR="red"]Total	16.43	52	3.16	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
					Step	Time	HTM[/B]
shape	2.50	11	4.40		shape	15.2%	21.2%
orient	4.34	16	3.69		orient	26.4%	30.8%
recog	1.70				recog	10.3%
permute	7.89	25	3.17		permute	48.0%	48.1%

(6,-1) / (-5,1) / (2,-1) / (0,-3) / (-5,1) / (-1,2) / (1,-2) / (-1,-4) / (0,1) / (6,0) / (-3,0) / (-5,-4) / (-3,-4) / (0,3) / (0,-4)

(-3,-2) / (-3,0) / (0,-2) / (-1,0) / (0,1) / (0,3) / - CS
(0,5) / (-3,0) / (3,6) / - CO
(3,0) / (-3,0) / (4,1) / (-4,-1) / (3,0) / - EO
(3,1) / (0,-3) / (0,3) / (0,-3) / (0,3) / - CP
(-3,-1) / (0,3) / (0,6) / (1,-5) / (-1,2) / (0,4) - EP

Code:

[B]Step	Time	HTM	tps[/b]
[COLOR="red"]Total	13.11	57	4.35	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
					Step	Time	HTM[/B]
shape	2.84	13	4.58		shape	21.7%	22.8%
orient	4.73	19	4.02		orient	36.1%	33.3%
recog	1.23				recog	9.4%
permute	4.31	25	5.80		permute	32.9%	43.9%

Code:

Mean (5/5)

[B]Step	Time	HTM	tps[/b]
[COLOR="red"]Total	13.86	55.67	4.02	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
					Step	Time	HTM[/B]
shape	2.36	11.33	4.80		shape	17.0%	20.4%
orient	4.40	17.00	3.86		orient	31.8%	30.5%
recog	1.41				recog	10.1%
permute	5.69	27.33	4.80		permute	41.1%	49.1%

Code:

Best from each field

[B]Step	Time	HTM	tps[/b]
[COLOR="red"]Total	12.05	52	4.81[/COLOR]

shape	0.00	10	5.75
orient	4.14	16	4.02
recog	1.23
permute	4.31	25	6.56

Reconstructions - Andrew
Statistics - Brest

Bhargav777 · Feb 6, 2013

Re: Andrew Nelson Square-1 NAR average Caltech 2012 (solves 3-5)

Awesome!

vcuber13 · Feb 6, 2013

(3,-1) / (-5,4) / (6,0) / (3,0) / (-3,0) / (0,3) / (6,3) / (-4,3) / (-3,0) / (-2,-1) / (0,-3) / (0,-4)

z2 - inspection
(-2,0) / (2,0) / (-2,3) / (-3,0) / (-3,0) / - CS

why not the inverse of / (-3,0) / (-2,-1) / (0,-3) / (0,-4)

blade740 · Feb 7, 2013

vcuber13 said:
why not the inverse of / (-3,0) / (-2,-1) / (0,-3) / (0,-4)

Mistake >_>;;

What I was going for was -4,0/2,3/-3,0/-3,0/

[NAR] Andrew Nelson Square-1 13.35 average Caltech 2012 (solves 3-5)

blade740

Mack Daddy

ottozing

Platinum Member

qqwref

Member

Dene

Premium Member

Petro Leum

Member

brandbest1

Member

Lid

Member

brandbest1

Member

JustinJ

Premium Member

Tong Haiwu

Member

Petro Leum

Member

Crazycubemom

Member

blade740

Mack Daddy

mmMarco17

Premium Member

Brest

Moderator

Bhargav777

OH friendly please

vcuber13

Member

blade740

Mack Daddy

Similar threads

Forum statistics

Share this page