|
|
Welcome to the Speedsolving.com - All Puzzles. All The Time.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us and we'll help you get started. We look forward to seeing you on the Forums!
Already a member? Login at the top of this page to stop seeing this message.
|
Have a question or looking for a particular topic/discussion? Try a quick search below:
|
|
08-31-2009 11:43 PM
|
#61
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ****, I should think ahead.
Posts: 133
|
Originally Posted by Tim Reynolds
|
|
Originally Posted by bobbyfearfactor
|
|
I'm also positive he wouldn't cheat, and I know it's the judge's fault for not paying attention to a very crucial rule, I just wanted to be sure.
|
Why are you so positive he wouldn't cheat? If it's because he has a blindfold world record, I think we can all agree that that's not proven to be a very good method.
I'm not saying I have any reason to believe he cheated (I don't, and I don't think he did), I just don't think getting good BLD times is reason enough to be completely trusted. There's only a few people whom I'm completely, positively sure would not peek when presented an easy opportunity to do so. I'm not saying that anyone is dishonest, I'm just saying that I don't have any reason to know for sure for most people, especially for people I've never met.
|
Why are you questioning his trust in the WR holder when you have the same trust? The reasons you don't think he cheated are probably the same reasons that Bobby doesn't think that he cheated.
__________________
"Oh Roy, I hope that's your cell phone that I'm sitting on"
"Uhh, actually it's my Rubik's Cube"
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2009 04:10 PM
|
#62
|
|
Lunar Cargos
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cambridge, MA (MIT Campus)
Posts: 2,210
|
|
Originally Posted by danjon
|
L2 D' F2 U2 L2 B2 U2 R' F' R' B L B2 R B' R2 B D L2
Haiyan Zhuang's 35.96s bld scramble.
|
This is definitely not the scramble he solved. From no scrambling angle does it match http://cid-6a0225773735dfd7.skydrive...773735DFD7!662, which is clearer than, but agrees with, the videos.
(Note the four green pieces on the top in the photo.)
EDIT: qqwref found it, see below. R2 F2 D2 R' U D B U2 B' U2 F U B R F' D R2 B in WCA orientation. I might have gotten it sooner had my internet connection not been acting silly. :-/ But really, I'll start reconstructing from the vids I have.
__________________
Officially the fastest person not using CFOP (Fridrich).
www.garron.us
Last edited by Lucas Garron : 09-08-2009 05:27 PM at 05:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2009 04:44 PM
|
#63
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,846
|
After taking a look at a good image and the best quality video I can find (watch HQ) I believe the following scramble is the one in the world record scramble:
Yellow top, red front
L2 F' U2 B' L2 D2 U2 B2 D R' U' L' F R D F U' B' L2 (19f, probably not optimal) ( view on alg.garron.us)
Haiyan solves green top, red front, by the way.
EDIT: optimal solution found! still use yellow top, red front:
F2 R2 U2 F' D U L D2 L' D2 R D L F R' U F2 L (18f*) ( view on alg.garron.us).
__________________
Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.82] [Megaminx: 1:00.56]
[2x2: 3.00] [3x3: 9.41] [4x4: 32.54] [5x5: 56.78] [6x6: 1:46.67] [7x7: 2:35.76]
Last edited by qqwref : 09-08-2009 05:12 PM at 05:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2009 06:34 PM
|
#64
|
|
Lunar Cargos
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cambridge, MA (MIT Campus)
Posts: 2,210
|
__________________
Officially the fastest person not using CFOP (Fridrich).
www.garron.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2009 11:24 PM
|
#65
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Görlitz, Germany
Posts: 597
|
Thank you so much for doing this Lucas! Sorry for annoying you about it over and over  . I did not know the scramble that was posted earlier was wrong.
__________________
Kai.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:09 AM.
|
|
|
