A is goujia
B and F are old and new Sheng En
E is Dainshen
It seems companies tied themselves to letters, so I wouldn't be surprised if the company that is now called Witeden was the same one that made all the Type C's. Unless someone actually knows differently.
wrong type A is Alpha not GouJia. GouJia is a separate company and type B was never made by Sheng En. If Sheng En mad type B's then they would still be around and never suckedOriginally Posted by Godmil
Last edited by Michael Womack; 01-04-2012 at 03:57 PM.
http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Guo-jia Are you sure?
http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/ind.../Type-B#Type-B There for Sheng En.
Last edited by Brest; 01-04-2012 at 04:06 PM. Reason: post merge
Type Es are Dianshengs. Diansheng also made a 2x2. Is that 2x2 called a Type E? No. Can we please just end this pointless argument?
Dianshing makes everything like YJ,QJ http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/ind...e_.28Type-E.29
What?
And how exactly does that relate to what we were talking about?
Why is it recommended to learn 1-2 OLL or PLL (any algorithms actually) per day? When I re-learnt all my OLL and PLL, I learnt 3-5 algs every day and had no problem. I think that's because I was re-learning them, I already knew all of them 2 years ago. Now when I'm trying to learn CLL for 2x2, should I just learn 1 alg every day? Recognition seems much more difficult than just OLL or PLL.
How to force OLL skips on these cases? I'd like direct algorithms, rather than doing something like making a the pair then just doing WV (unless it's the easiest way).
Last edited by JyH; 01-04-2012 at 04:47 PM.
Learn as many as you feel comfortable with. I, personally, can learn between 1 and 5 algorithms a day depending on the complexity and length. OLLs, for example, are often just a flurry of triggers that remove and re-insert F2L slots, so they're generally pretty easy. PLLs though are a little trickier.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks