Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: My sucky average of 10.

  1. #1

    Default My sucky average of 10.

    I am using intuitive f2l.(I suck at it even though I have been using it for a few months) @ look oll and some pll.(Need to finnd better algorithms for u though.)
    Average: 00:54.67
    Avg. 5: 00:55.33
    3 of 5: 00:55.52
    Best: 00:45.19

    This was out of 10. Oh and my cross takes 8-12 seconds. THoughts and help.

  2. #2
    Member Vulosity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    FL, USA
    YouTube
    vulosityhd
    Posts
    969

    Default

    Focus on your cross making and solve it on bottom.
    Goal: sub 1:30 on 5x5

  3. #3
    Member DAE_JA_VOO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pretoria, South Africa
    Posts
    868

    Default

    Keep working on F2L. Intuitive F2L takes a while because you need to build the "algorithms" in your brain yourself. but once you get the hang of it, you'll LOVE it. I just finished a 3.5 hour cubing session, and i was loving every minute of F2L because it's completely intuitive

    You should start learning the PLLs too. Use Intuitive F2L, 2 look OLL, and the PLLs for a while. Keep working hard on that combination of things to solve the cube. That's what i'm using now and i average 28 seconds. I do know about 10 of the OLLs as well though.
    I can solve a Rubik's Cube
    DAEJAVOO.com

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by griz View Post
    I am using intuitive f2l.(I suck at it even though I have been using it for a few months) @ look oll and some pll.(Need to finnd better algorithms for u though.)
    Average: 00:54.67
    Avg. 5: 00:55.33
    3 of 5: 00:55.52
    Best: 00:45.19

    This was out of 10. Oh and my cross takes 8-12 seconds. THoughts and help.
    Your cross takes 8-12 seconds? Work on that!

    I would always advise using a different method (like Waterman or Roux, because they're cooler), but that's just me. I mean, if you ever want to get better than everyone else using Fridrich, who have just about taken it to its max, then you should use a different method to beat them!

    And of course everyone says, "Go slow and look ahead"
    Waterman Average of 12: 39.55, Avg. of 5:38.57
    Best Non-Lucky Solve: 36.34

  5. #5

    Default

    Vulosity the sad thing is I do solve cross on bottom. I will Keep working on the f2l and learn some plls.Thanks for your advice

  6. #6
    Member Vulosity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    FL, USA
    YouTube
    vulosityhd
    Posts
    969

    Default

    practice!!!
    Goal: sub 1:30 on 5x5

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    WCA Profile
    2008HUYN01
    YouTube
    pcharles93
    Posts
    1,061

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vulosity View Post
    Focus on your cross making and solve it on bottom.
    No! I'm sub-20 and I solve with cross on top. No one does cross on top anymore. Why doesn't anyone start doing cross on top? I mean cross on bottom lets you watch F2L pieces move around and lets you break into F2L without flipping the entire cube, but.... You know what. I think I might try to convert.
    PB's: 3x3 9.76/16.12, 5x5 2:24/2:51, 4x4 1:03/1:16, OH 29.02/38.57

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Louisville, CO, USA
    WCA Profile
    2008PALO01
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-xbcAMfWwM
    You might try giving that video a view or two- I though my F2L was pretty efficient, but after using some of the tricks badmephisto shows I dropped my times by 5-10 seconds.
    Megaminx- 1:56.33 | 3x3- 24.74 | 2x2 - 7.06 (all a12)
    Looking for the best 3x3? | Want to get faster?

  9. #9
    The Punchmaster DavidWoner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kansas City, MO, USA
    WCA Profile
    2008WONE01
    YouTube
    vault312
    Posts
    3,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcharles93 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vulosity View Post
    Focus on your cross making and solve it on bottom.
    No! I'm sub-20 and I solve with cross on top. No one does cross on top anymore. Why doesn't anyone start doing cross on top? I mean cross on bottom lets you watch F2L pieces move around and lets you break into F2L without flipping the entire cube, but.... You know what. I think I might try to convert.
    i am cross on top... also f2l on left, which seems to be dying out. i also think im one of only a few who got sub20 without full PLL. still use two Ts for E perm, and conjugated J perms for the N's.

    but yeah. practice. a lot. if you have not improved using intuitive f2l after a few months, then i am not 100% sure you fully understand intuitive f2l. did you design your method yourself, or did you learn how to start intuitive from a video like badmephisto's?
    (3:11:06 PM) Kirjava: I'm also famous for being nice when presented with stupid questions
    My youtube and my website. Team # <3

  10. #10
    chang shelley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    WCA Profile
    2004CHAN04
    Posts
    1,656

    Default

    I do cross on top (sometimes back or left, whichever is nicer) and F2L on left. You're right, Vault, we seem to be a dying breed. F2L on bottom is easier to write tutorials for, so most of the newer kids in the cubing scene learned that way. Even when I teach people I teach F2L on bottom.

    To the topic creator: it seems like you just need more practice. Practice your intuitive F2L until you don't even have to think about it anymore. And work on your cross too; there's no reason it should take 8-12 seconds. Can you figure out how to assemble your cross in 7-8 moves or less every time? If not, that's something to practice.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •