Rpotts
Member
I agree to the last part, but I will have to talk this out with you later in the thread i want to make. I can't right now though, seeing as how I am feeling quite sick. Suffusive to say, your arsen example is in fact Logically sound, but it is not valid. Valid means that the claims are actually true in the real world. Sound just means that it follows logical form without any of the premises being inherently false. My claims, however are sound and valid; winning, in the general sense is the perception by the majority that one person is correct is as true as any statement made about majority of peoples can be (Everyone may not agree on this definition- you obviously don't- but the majority of people would, hence my use of the word majority). It is not a stretch, it just doesn't satisfy you because you are not part of the majority. We can discuss this more later if you would like to.
Who are the people in this supposed majority of yours?
And once again, since you've ignored my previous post, arguments from authority and arguments ad populum are logical fallacies. I posted specific examples of how your claims are not sound or valid, you simply assert your claim's validity, which doesn't cut it.
Also, lol at "Suffusive to say"
Suffice it to say.