# Thread: 1.53 2x2 average of 5 and 1.80 average of 12

1. So what do we learn from this? Never film 2x2x2 Solves!

Originally Posted by RCTACameron
In a WCA competition, they would be unacceptable
That's the only thing I'm refering to.For your home average this is fine enough, but it creates a bad attitude that you might persue in competition.

2. Originally Posted by Sebastien
So what do we learn from this? Never film 2x2x2 Solves!

That's the only thing I'm refering to.For your home average this is fine enough, but it creates a bad attitude that you might persue in competition.
Okay, thanks for the reminder. I will try to do better timer stops, but I can't guarantee anything.

3. Originally Posted by RCTACameron
I agree, I don't want there to be argument over this again. If you are strict about following WCA rules at home, then yes, this was a DNF average. The point of this thread is that I can do a 1.53 average of 5 and a 1.80 average of 12, if I am allowed >15s inspection. As far as I know, the only way to use the WCA inspection timer on PPT with stackmat is to hold both hands on the timer while you inspect, so it is impractical for me to use that. If you only want to see solves that follow WCA regulations, I will probably have a competition in September.
Most of the good 2x2ers can do 1.53 avg of 5 and 1.80 avg of 12 if they are allowed >15s inspection.
Btw i like your videos, and it is amazing how fast you can turn the 2x2.

4. congrats on the averages. Sucks about the 3 mover . Yeah we need to all calm down and just ignore the long inspection time, i mean, its not like its official or anything. chillax

5. Yeah, you did the 7th scramble wrong.
Scramble: 1.96 F2 U' F U' F R2 F R2 U2 R' U'
Reconstruction:
x' R' U' R2
F R U R' U' R U R' U' F' U
14 moves = 7.14 tps
Was funny to watch how you failed F' move at first
But why didn't you do x2 R' F U R' F U' R U R2 U? It's Anti-CLL with cancellations, and it's 4 moves shorter.
Added: Hm, reconstructing(watching video by frames) is so interesting

6. Wow, so few congratulations....

CONGRATS CAM

Hope to see you break your PBs at Aus nats

Cam for WR

7. Originally Posted by rowehessler
congrats on the averages. Sucks about the 3 mover . Yeah we need to all calm down and just ignore the long inspection time, i mean, its not like its official or anything. chillax
Thanks, and yeah I need to stop failing easy scrambles. I think people are overreacting about the inspection time in the average of 5, and I'll still count it as a PB, but the last 2 solves of the average of 12 did have kind of long inspection.

Originally Posted by NSKuber
Yeah, you did the 7th scramble wrong.
Scramble: 1.96 F2 U' F U' F R2 F R2 U2 R' U'
Reconstruction:
x' R' U' R2
F R U R' U' R U R' U' F' U
14 moves = 7.14 tps
Was funny to watch how you failed F' move at first
But why didn't you do x2 R' F U R' F U' R U R2 U? It's Anti-CLL with cancellations, and it's 4 moves shorter.
Added: Hm, reconstructing(watching video by frames) is so interesting
Thanks, I'll add this to the post/video description. And I guess I just didn't notice that solution in inspection. I noticed it when trying to reconstruct though.

Originally Posted by god of rubic 2
Wow, so few congratulations....

CONGRATS CAM

Hope to see you break your PBs at Aus nats

Cam for WR
Lol you have said that before and I haven't got WR. We'll just see what happens.

8. The 1.84 so unlucky so so unlucky

9. Originally Posted by tx789
The 1.84 so unlucky so so unlucky
It was lucky and unlucky at the same time..

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•