I see no evidence that using a bad cube makes you accurate. I just see that using a good cube gets you used to using a good cube.
Confirmation bias
I see no evidence that using a bad cube makes you accurate. I just see that using a good cube gets you used to using a good cube.
Confirmation bias
I see no evidence that turning accurately makes you a faster cuber.
Agh I lost a big post when my iPod crashedrest assured I have lots I want to say on this topic... Or I could save some time and mention that there was a large thread a wee while ago where this point was hammered out.
I have to agree with this one. I can only speak from my experience but I started off with a Rubik's brand and used that for a while. The hard part about solving a rubik's is that you have to apply way more force to do a turn than a DIY at the time. Eventually I got my DIY and every solve it popped because I was used to the rubik's brand. I think this is the unlearning phase because at that time my focus turned to solving accurately so that it wouldn't pop. For a DIY that meant turning with less force than I was used to. When I went from my type c to my guhong there was a similar story but it wasn't as bad as the transition from rubik's to DIY. However, when I got my zhanchi I had already learned to be as precise as possible on a cube of any tension.
Had I started with a zhanchi or type c for that matter, I would have just learned how to control that type of cube and my progress would have probably been quicker in the long run because everytime I upgraded my cube and adapted to the style that it required I instantly beat all my pbs and realized that the cube was holding me back a little. But again that's just my experience. I didn't see starting out with a bad cube helping me with anything. All it did was give me the bad habits of using wrist movements even when I upgraded to better cubes.
Bookmarks