Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread: Columns First - underestimated method?

  1. 07-06-2012 #31
    Ickenicke
    Ickenicke is offline
    Member Ickenicke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    YouTube
    MrZickinicki
    Posts
    903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drewsopchak View Post
    Regardless of its practicality, I would like to see someone dedicate a couple years with it and see how far they get.
    Why can't you try?
    Personal records: PB/NL/5/12/25/50/100 3x3x3 9.20/11.42/12.31/13.15/13.40/14.06/14.40 Cubing since 10th May 2011
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-06-2012 #32
    uberCuber
    uberCuber is offline
    Member uberCuber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    WCA Profile
    2011THOM01
    Posts
    2,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ickenicke View Post
    Why can't you try?
    He doesn't want to waste his own time, he wants to see someone else do it for him.
    5x5 (1/5/12/25/50/100)
    1:06.40, 1:13.30, 1:15.20, 1:16.48, 1:18.11, 1:18.61
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-06-2012 #33
    Ickenicke
    Ickenicke is offline
    Member Ickenicke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    YouTube
    MrZickinicki
    Posts
    903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uberCuber View Post
    He doesn't want to waste his own time, he wants to see someone else do it for him.
    Yeah, columns first is probably as stupid as solving 4x4 with OBLBL
    Personal records: PB/NL/5/12/25/50/100 3x3x3 9.20/11.42/12.31/13.15/13.40/14.06/14.40 Cubing since 10th May 2011
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-06-2012 #34
    uberCuber
    uberCuber is offline
    Member uberCuber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    WCA Profile
    2011THOM01
    Posts
    2,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ickenicke View Post
    Yeah, columns first is probably as stupid as solving 4x4 with OBLBL
    I'm not completely done wasting my time with that method, just postponing it until after US Nats
    5x5 (1/5/12/25/50/100)
    1:06.40, 1:13.30, 1:15.20, 1:16.48, 1:18.11, 1:18.61
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-06-2012 #35
    5BLD
    5BLD is online now
    Member 5BLD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England
    WCA Profile
    2011LAUA01
    YouTube
    5BLD
    Posts
    3,000
    Send a message via Skype™ to 5BLD

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ickenicke View Post
    Why can't you try?
    If I'm convinced I can get a similar or better movecount than with Roux then I will try after UKO for a month or so.
    (a^b)^c = a^(b c) e^(2 i pi c floor(1/2-(Im(b log(a)))/(2 pi)))
    I've been cubing for only just over 2 years and I feel old already
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 07-06-2012 #36
    Ickathu
    Ickathu is offline
    Member Ickathu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    WCA Profile
    2011MERT03
    YouTube
    Ickathu
    Posts
    1,327
    Send a message via Skype™ to Ickathu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drewsopchak View Post
    Regardless of its practicality, I would like to see someone dedicate a couple years with it and see how far they get.
    Maybe a couple years, maybe not, but I'm definitely going to practice it, and possibly switch from Roux to this (or even get to the point of doing CFOP/Roux/Columns first depending on the scramble)
    "A mathematician, like a painter or poet, is a maker of patterns." ~G. H. Hardy
    Pyra PBs (1/3/5/12/100): 2.13, 4.08, 4.42, 5.23, 5.91
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules