Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55

Thread: WCA Guidelines 2012

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Super-Duper Moderator Lucas Garron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Where the rolling foothills rise
    WCA Profile
    2006GARR01
    YouTube
    LucasGarron
    Posts
    2,833

    Default WCA Guidelines 2012

    Hi all,

    Rather than debating all these little details, let's do something about it!

    As you may be aware, we are planning to publish the next version of the Regulations with accompanying Guidelines. They will be just as binding, but they should contain all the interpretations and clarifications that don't belong in the rules. This way, delegates have a clear reference for making decisions.

    However, there are a lot of small rules, and we could use your help in making sure we have everything covered. If you know (or want to know) something about the regulations that should be clarified, please post it in the thread with either the word QUESTION or the word SUGGESTION.
    Like this:

    SUGGESTION (A2): Competitors are not allowed to request a specific orientation for a puzzle.

    SUGGESTION (3c): "Stickerless" puzzles like stickerless GuHongs are not allowed for any event. (WCA thread)

    QUESTION (5b): If a single corner twists in place, what is the competitor allowed to do?

    Some things that would help:
    • Please include a reference to a section of the regulations, if possible.
    • If the topic has been previously discussed, please provide links.
    • If you have any examples from real events that help illustrate the topic, please give us as much information as you can, so the WRC can make informed decisions when compiling and deciding the Guidelines. In particular, it helps to know about rulings from delegates at actual competitions around the world.



    Thanks.
    Last edited by Lucas Garron; 06-27-2012 at 12:11 AM.
    garron.us | cubing.net | twisty.js | ACube.js | Mark 2 | Regs | Show people your algs: alg.garron.us

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Mike Hughey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    WCA Profile
    2007HUGH01
    YouTube
    MikeHughey1
    Posts
    7,444

    Default

    I'll work on this tomorrow. But for now, I'd like to mention that I hope both of your examples above are included - they need to be.
    My square-1 BLD method: http://skarrie.se/square1blind/

  3. #3
    Member DrKorbin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Russia, Moscow
    WCA Profile
    2011GRIT01
    YouTube
    Korbinification
    Posts
    462

    Default

    QUESTION (H): In multi-bld, if a competitor reaches his time limit, and some of his cubes have misalignment, are they treated as +2 or not solved?
    (It seems to me Ron has said they are not solved, but I can't provide a link).

    SUGGESTION (4d): If there is black and no white, the cube is scrambled black on top, green (or darkest adjanced color) on front.
    link

    SUGGESTION (2e1): Nationality is exactly a citizenship (i.e. you have a passport of this country (but how must young people who have no passport be treated?)), not membership of a nation in the sense of ethnic group.
    link

  4. #4
    Member MaeLSTRoM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    WCA Profile
    2011WALL02
    YouTube
    MLSTRMRVLTN
    Posts
    1,584

    Default

    QUESTION (9F14): What is to happen if 2 competitors have the same average and the same best single?
    Quote from IRC, talking about aachen open 2012 cutoffs for 3x3 final:

    (4:06:06 PM) AardappelsapBASc: the funny thing was there would be 12 people in the podium fnials
    (4:06:14 PM) AardappelsapBASc: and number 12 and 13 had exactly the same avg..
    (4:06:21 PM) AardappelsapBASc: so we looked at who had the best single
    (4:06:31 PM) AardappelsapBASc: but they both also had the same best single xD
    ...
    (4:06:48 PM) Rawrbert: so look at 2nd best solve instead? o_O
    (4:07:03 PM) AardappelsapBASc: lol no, there is no solution for it in the regulations
    (4:07:10 PM) AardappelsapBASc: so they could both be in the podium finals
    Mega is mega :3 K4 :D
    Proud Holder of Megaminx UKNR's

  5. #5
    Member ardi4nto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
    WCA Profile
    2009SATR01
    YouTube
    ardisatriawan
    Posts
    181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaeLSTRoM View Post
    QUESTION (9F14): What is to happen if 2 competitors have the same average and the same best single?
    Quote from IRC, talking about aachen open 2012 cutoffs for 3x3 final:

    (4:06:06 PM) AardappelsapBASc: the funny thing was there would be 12 people in the podium fnials
    (4:06:14 PM) AardappelsapBASc: and number 12 and 13 had exactly the same avg..
    (4:06:21 PM) AardappelsapBASc: so we looked at who had the best single
    (4:06:31 PM) AardappelsapBASc: but they both also had the same best single xD
    ...
    (4:06:48 PM) Rawrbert: so look at 2nd best solve instead? o_O
    (4:07:03 PM) AardappelsapBASc: lol no, there is no solution for it in the regulations
    (4:07:10 PM) AardappelsapBASc: so they could both be in the podium finals
    Both will be have same position.
    Just like FMC with same move counts.
    I need to do sub 30 FMC officially!

  6. #6
    Member MaeLSTRoM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    WCA Profile
    2011WALL02
    YouTube
    MLSTRMRVLTN
    Posts
    1,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ardi4nto View Post
    Both will be have same position.
    Just like FMC with same move counts.
    Sorry, I should have been clearer, The problem was that only one of them should have proceeded to the finals, how should this be decided if it comes up again.
    Mega is mega :3 K4 :D
    Proud Holder of Megaminx UKNR's

  7. #7
    Premium Member theZcuber's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Central NY, US
    WCA Profile
    2012PRAT02
    Posts
    1,796

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaeLSTRoM View Post
    Sorry, I should have been clearer, The problem was that only one of them should have proceeded to the finals, how should this be decided if it comes up again.
    If it stays within the 25% limit, then it was legal to send them both to finals. If it doesn't, neither can go. As it stands now, one can't go and one can, but they can both be held back
    RPG (CFOP and Roux) - CubingStats
    WCA - CubingUSA - canadianCUBING - UKCA
    RPG and CubingStats can be useful, try them out!

  8. #8
    Member vcuber13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Near Toronto
    WCA Profile
    2009METH01
    YouTube
    simpsons36109
    Posts
    2,193

    Default

    QUESTION (3c): Should the use of stickerless cubes be only for blind events, and should it be at the delegates descretion?

    SUGGESTION (3c): "Stickerless" puzzles like stickerless GuHongs are allowed ONLY for blind events.

    SUGGESTION (5b): If a single corner twists in place, the competitor is allowed to twist it in place.
    Last edited by vcuber13; 06-27-2012 at 05:12 AM.
    Official 3x3 Personal Bests: 11.72, 13.88
    Official Square-1 Personal Bests: 13.15 NR, 15.31

  9. #9
    Member Ickathu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    WCA Profile
    2011MERT03
    YouTube
    Ickathu
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    Suggestion 4g) [?]: Scrambling orientation for non-cubic puzzles (e.g., pyra, mega): Lightest color on bottom, darkest adjacent color on front
    "A mathematician, like a painter or poet, is a maker of patterns." ~G. H. Hardy
    Pyra PBs (1/3/5/12/100): 2.13, 4.08, 4.42, 5.23, 5.91

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Near Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    WCA Profile
    2010DAVI06
    YouTube
    DeanOfBloons
    Posts
    1,736

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ardi4nto View Post
    Both will be have same position.
    Just like FMC with same move counts.
    He's talking about a round before the finals.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ickathu View Post
    Suggestion 4g) [?]: Scrambling orientation for non-cubic puzzles (e.g., pyra, mega): Lightest color on bottom, darkest adjacent color on front
    This doesn't work with the way megaminx is scrambled (or did you mean lightest colour on top?)
    [1/5/12/100] [3x3: 7.36/9.56/10.37/11.18] [4x4: 38.36/46.16/48.37/52.35] [Pyraminx: 1.94/4.26/4.59/5.54]
    3BLD: 1:01.80 4BLD: 6:09.88 5BLD: 14:55.95

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •