Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: What matters more, Rubik's cube average or single?

  1. #11
    Member drewsopchak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Central Upstate New York
    WCA Profile
    2010SOPC01
    YouTube
    sebucwerd
    Posts
    881

    Default

    Needs more poll options................................ Average.

  2. #12
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    7,047

    Default

    The shorter the puzzle, and the more luck, the more the average matters. I guess the extreme example might be 2x2, where single is basically completely irrelevant, and even averages of 5 or 12 have a lot of luck in them. The 3x3 is still very much a puzzle where the average matters more. When you have a really long puzzle like 8x8x8 or Gigaminx, though, the average is not really very important, because a single good solve gives enough information about how fast someone is. On a puzzle with so many individual things to do, you really can't get very lucky.
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.33] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.45] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    664

    Default

    averages are more meaningful i feel
    because you can get really lucky skips, but averages are harder to have lower times in, because it's based on multiple trials. i.e. you can have outliers, but the box says more than the whiskers
    ZZ-solver now =D, get dem ZZ solves down yo~ you should too =D you know you want to :3
    PB 1/5/12/100 13.55/16.83/18.50/19.83 not being lazy too hard QQ

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Australia
    WCA Profile
    2014SWEE01
    Posts
    321

    Default

    A good average basically shows that you're not just some random cuber who got a lucky scramble. It will just show people that you're purely skilled

  5. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    WCA Profile
    2011FONG02
    Posts
    428

    Default

    Yes, in competitions it's the average that counts, but I think it's the single times that people, including cubers will be looking at. I mean, if you would be asked what the single 3x3 WR is, you would probably without hesitation say: Feliks Zemdegs, 5.66. But do you know what the average WR is, without looking it up? Chances are you don't. Or, do you know the winning average time of Michal Pleskowicz at the Worlds, without looking it up? I don't.

    That's because we can see single times happening when they happen. We have videos on youtube we can watch and hear people cheer at competitions. With an average, you have to calculate it first before you know it. For example, at the Zonhoven Open, Marcell Endrey got a 3BLD WR and everybody was aware of that. Mats Valk got a very good 4x4 average but it wasn't until later that we realised it was an average WR, at least according to the information we had available at that time (we weren't aware of what had happened in Australia)

    To make a long story short: In competitions it's the average that matters but popularly, I think it's single times that matter most because they give you instant results.

  6. #16
    Member irontwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    WCA Profile
    2010JERN01
    YouTube
    jernqvist
    Posts
    1,586

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Czery View Post
    But what about Blind? and FMC? I would assume single to be the case here.
    Just because that's the way it works in competitions doesn't mean it's more indicative of skill.
    I'm gonna go get me some FMC.

  7. #17
    Member HelpCube's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    My Stackmat
    YouTube
    HelpCube
    Posts
    495

    Default

    Single obviously. Luck determines your actual speed, duh...
    Constructive criticism > Compliments.

  8. #18
    Member applemobile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    exeter uk
    Posts
    862

    Default

    It depends what you were intending to do. I.e I I am doing a adv. of 12, I will go slow and look ahead, but if I am goin for a good single I will absolutely Kane through F2L hoping that I will spot my pieces. The latter gives me worse Averege but throws out the best singles.

  9. #19
    Member Cheese11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    WCA Profile
    2011KULC01
    YouTube
    EricKulchycki
    Posts
    1,063

    Default

    Definetly the average. It takes skill to average a low speed consistantly. But you can easily get lucky and get a good solve.

    Btw, that is a crime
    I live in Canada, I literally have to warm up before I cube :)

  10. #20
    Member mchedlo213's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Tbilisi,Georgia
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Don't know if it is necessary but I guess I will re-iterate what has been said already. Averages are better indicator of skill and I mean people don't really get singles beyond like 10 seconds below their average. I honestly wouldn't believe if some one who averages say 1 min said they got a time of 20 seconds with a legit scramble (not prepared solve or like a LL only scramble) but i wouldn't be surprised if some one who averages like 13 seconds got a sub 10 time. The only time a single is really more impressive is if it is a world record or some kind of recognized feat. For example, if you really did get a 20 second single and you average 1 min, no one would really care, but if you break the world record single, people don't care much about what your average is. Of course, like I mentioned before, the best singles generally also belong to the people with the best averages, so they are rather closely related, but ya in general average is more "important".
    well said.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •