Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: [Discussion] Alternatives to F2L Pairs

  1. #1
    statue
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    West Chester, PA
    WCA Profile
    2008KORI02
    YouTube
    StachuK1992
    Posts
    3,559

    Default [Discussion] Alternatives to F2L Pairs

    I don't think enough research has been done here.

    This is under the assumption that the cross has been made and you want to reduce the cube to LL within 3-4 steps.

    One suggestion; 2corners, 2edges, 2 corners, 2 edges.


    There must be something here we've neglected, no?
    Let's expand CFOP a bit more.

  2. #2
    Premium Member ThomasJE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    England
    YouTube
    ThomasJECubing
    Posts
    1,723

    Default

    I once thought of doing the F2B like in Roux, then finish F2L by adding the DF and DB edges using M slices, then do OLL/PLL. I suppose that's effectively FreeFOP, but that could be effective for Roux users. Doing a Petrus 2x2x3, and then inserting the final cross edge and an F2L pair (X-cross style) and inserting the final F2L pair could be a liable alternative.

    These are just ideas from the top of my head; I'm sure someone else can improve these/come up with better ideas.
    (1/5/12) 3x3x3 - 11.88/15.61/16.65 | 4x4x4 - 1:08.10/1:18.46/1:23.41 | 2x2x2 - 1.01/3.70/4.59
    All PB's | My Website | Substep Competition | ZZ and proud :D | Weilong!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •