Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Commutator notation extension - [A,B,C]

  1. #11

  2. #12

  3. #13
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    7,033

    Default

    Nobody used it enough to make it become a standard, and it was confusing when people did use it.
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.33] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.45] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  4. #14
    Colourful Kirjava's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    WCA Profile
    2006BARL01
    YouTube
    snkenjoi
    Posts
    6,019

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qqwref View Post
    and it was confusing when people did use it.
    When did this happen?

  5. #15
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    7,033

    Default

    I think I saw it once or twice in a random cubing thread or something. Not sure.
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.33] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.45] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  6. #16
    Colourful Kirjava's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    WCA Profile
    2006BARL01
    YouTube
    snkenjoi
    Posts
    6,019

    Default

    that was said with the least amount of conviction ever

  7. #17
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    7,033

    Default

    This topic was 9 months ago, and you expect me to remember details of where I saw an obscure notation on this forum?
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.33] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.45] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  8. #18
    Colourful Kirjava's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    WCA Profile
    2006BARL01
    YouTube
    snkenjoi
    Posts
    6,019

    Default

    no, I think you added the part about confusion without really thinking to add weight to your statement, then when pressed for an example came up with "I think I saw it once or twice in a random cubing thread or something. Not sure."

    I didn't say that because it may not be true, but that mindset I had made your post humourous to read.

  9. #19
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    7,033

    Default

    Yeah, makes sense. My memory is fuzzy but I do remember seeing the notation once outside of this thread and being confused for a bit.
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.33] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.45] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  10. #20
    Premium Member theZcuber's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Central NY, US
    WCA Profile
    2012PRAT02
    Posts
    2,037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by qqwref View Post
    Yeah, makes sense. My memory is fuzzy but I do remember seeing the notation once outside of this thread and being confused for a bit.
    I believe Brest used it once in a reconstruction. If my memory serves me correct specifically it was on one of Maskow's blindfolded ones (and Maskow corrected him saying that he thought of the commutator differently)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •