Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Practicing Old Pochmann/M2

  1. #1
    Member foolish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    61

    Default Practicing Old Pochmann/M2

    So, I've been checking out tutorials and started practicing Old Pochmann/M2 within the last days and still got some questions.

    1) Most tutorials give lots of tips and ideas on practicing the memorization, but apart from the algorithms I haven't read much about the execution. So I wondered, should I directly start memorizing the cube and try to solve (parts of) it blind or would it help to train the method with eyes open first until it can be done pretty fast without too much thinking?

    2) I've learnt most of the stuff from Eric Limeback's tutorial on youtube so far and he solves the corners first, then the edges. When checking Stefan's site, I saw that he solves edges first. Is there any advantage in doing either of them first, or just personal preference?

    3) I also find it not too easy to do/undo some setup moves intuitively, although they're pretty short. Is learning them by heart for each case an option or should I just keep practicing until I can make them up on the run?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Member thatkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sydney, Australia mate
    WCA Profile
    2012SEET01
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foolish View Post
    So, I've been checking out tutorials and started practicing Old Pochmann/M2 within the last days and still got some questions.

    1) Most tutorials give lots of tips and ideas on practicing the memorization, but apart from the algorithms I haven't read much about the execution. So I wondered, should I directly start memorizing the cube and try to solve (parts of) it blind or would it help to train the method with eyes open first until it can be done pretty fast without too much thinking?

    2) I've learnt most of the stuff from Eric Limeback's tutorial on youtube so far and he solves the corners first, then the edges. When checking Stefan's site, I saw that he solves edges first. Is there any advantage in doing either of them first, or just personal preference?

    3) I also find it not too easy to do/undo some setup moves intuitively, although they're pretty short. Is learning them by heart for each case an option or should I just keep practicing until I can make them up on the run?

    Thanks
    1) I personally find it easier to practise parts of it blind rather than doing sighted (eyes open) solving.
    2) Eric Limeback solves corners first because of his memo system. It involves tapping and memorising colours. This can not be stored for a very long time so when he does corners first, he still remembers the edges because he has a stronger memo system for them
    3) Keep practising. This is the only step that i recommend learning sighted. Just remember to keep set up moves 3 moves long for edges and 1-2 moves long for corners
    3BLD - 1:35.xx | MBLD - 3/3 20:22.37
    4BLD - 9:51.18 | 5BLD -

  3. #3
    Member AbstractAlg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    WCA Profile
    2012OKAN02
    YouTube
    AbstractAlgorithm
    Posts
    377

    Default

    1) Practice both ways, sighted for speed, full bld mostly for memo.

    2) Tapping+sound gives you fast memo, but short-term. So I would recommend memo edges, memo corners, solve corners, solve edges. Also, I think it's easier to fix parity with corners first.

    3) Keep practicing x2, understand why certain setups are the way they are and they will become very natural.
    3BLD: slowly getting fast 4BLD: 6:27 [2:55]
    3x3: 7.99 [single] 11.79 [ao5]

  4. #4
    Member sukesh12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Proxima Centauri
    WCA Profile
    2011SUBA02
    YouTube
    ksubaharan
    Posts
    26

    Default

    I had the same doubts as 'foolish' and I got the answers from 'thatkid'

  5. #5
    Member thatkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sydney, Australia mate
    WCA Profile
    2012SEET01
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AbstractAlg View Post
    Also, I think it's easier to fix parity with corners first.
    Lol its actually easier if you do edges first because you don't need the R perm after edges
    just do U' F2 U M2 U' F2 U
    then solve corners
    3BLD - 1:35.xx | MBLD - 3/3 20:22.37
    4BLD - 9:51.18 | 5BLD -

  6. #6
    Member Rpotts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Topikachu, KS
    WCA Profile
    2010POTT01
    YouTube
    rpotts1
    Posts
    1,782

    Default

    You don't need R perm to solve parity regardless of whether you solve corners first or edges first. I've never done an R perm in BLD and have only used M2/OP with corners first.

  7. #7
    Member thatkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sydney, Australia mate
    WCA Profile
    2012SEET01
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rpotts View Post
    You don't need R perm to solve parity regardless of whether you solve corners first or edges first. I've never done an R perm in BLD and have only used M2/OP with corners first.
    Oh really? I've always done parity with an R perm
    3BLD - 1:35.xx | MBLD - 3/3 20:22.37
    4BLD - 9:51.18 | 5BLD -

  8. #8
    Forever Slow Cubenovice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Vlaams-Brabant (Belgium)
    Posts
    2,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thatkid View Post
    Oh really? I've always done parity with an R perm
    Ehm... isn't R-perm for parity in full Old Pochmann?
    This is about M2 edges and there you do not need R-perm
    Last edited by Cubenovice; 03-07-2012 at 02:39 AM.
    [23:23] <+Kirjava> it's hard to do what I do if you're not ****ing insane
    I accidentily a 3rd line

  9. #9
    Member thatkid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sydney, Australia mate
    WCA Profile
    2012SEET01
    Posts
    102

    Default

    hmmm
    that means ive been doing a useless R perm for about a year
    3BLD - 1:35.xx | MBLD - 3/3 20:22.37
    4BLD - 9:51.18 | 5BLD -

  10. #10
    Premium Member JasonK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    WCA Profile
    2011KILB01
    Posts
    1,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thatkid View Post
    hmmm
    that means ive been doing a useless R perm for about a year
    You're not alone - I did the same thing for a long time, and I still sometimes fall back into old habits without realising.
    Beep

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •