[Unofficial] Sub-20 with 20 different methods

Uh yeah this afternoon (and did a few in the evening a minute ago) I challenged myself to see how many methods I could sub-20 with, inspired by Thom's video but giving myself less time to do it.


I was actually planning on doing 21 but I did struggle with HTA and that's the only other I could think of. Oh and L2L4 but I don't know the algs. So yeah... Here goes, tell me what you think.

Holy shhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttt. Not you too! Good job :tu

Gogogo Brest?

Thanks
I got slightly lucky on like 2 of them (so did Kir) so don't be surprised

<3 Triangular Francisco

Very impressive! I doubt I could sub 20 with 10 methods. Gratz!

I love the belt solve. You took 5 seconds recognising an R perm. . Very impressive stuff.

Thanks guys for teh congrats and stuff.

Muesli said:

I love the belt solve. You took 5 seconds recognising an R perm. . Very impressive stuff.

Click to expand...

Haha my PLL might be a liittle rusty having not used it for months ;D

Woah, I didn't even know that all those methods existed. I'll google them, see if there's anything I can learn once I master Roux I love this period of time where you are trying to learn something new, eheh!

I find sub-20 with Heise and Kociemba the most impressive, although all of them were really cool especially the sub-10 roux

How long do you cube every day? That is INSANE, I still don't see how people get so good si fast. Gratz!

wow..so cool man..
when you learn or transfer into another methods, how long did you have to learn the algorithm??

Jeeeeeeesus you improve quickly... That's seriously impressive

Kirjava in his 20 methods thread said:

As far as I know, no one else is capable of anything close to this - at least with this range of methods. I looked on the speedcubing.com record list archive and it said Ravi Fernando could do 13 methods in under 3 mins. I think with 3 mins I could keep making up enough methods to reach 100

Click to expand...

Lol owned

no MGLS?

blackzabbathfan said:

no MGLS?

Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure MGLS is a subset not a method.

JonnyWhoopes said:

I'm pretty sure MGLS is a subset not a method.

Click to expand...

as is ZB

theZcuber said:

as is ZB

Click to expand...

I haven't watched the video, so I don't know what "methods" were used. (Actually, that's a good idea for you 5BLD; put a list of the methods in the OP)

If you have a point, please state it.

No point, just showing that substeps generally allow it to be considered a different method if it's big enough of a change

JonnyWhoopes said:

I'm pretty sure MGLS is a subset not a method.

Click to expand...

theZcuber said:

as is ZB

Click to expand...

JonnyWhoopes said:

I haven't watched the video, so I don't know what "methods" were used. (Actually, that's a good idea for you 5BLD; put a list of the methods in the OP)

If you have a point, please state it.

Click to expand...

His point was that ZB was used in the video. So subsets were fair game.

EDIT: Ninjaed

theZcuber said:

No point, just showing that substeps generally allow it to be considered a different method if it's big enough of a change

Click to expand...

That sounds like a point to me. =)

One of my pet peeves is when people leave what they meant for the mind readers.

Seriously though, does somebody want to put up a text list of the methods used? It's easier for me to read a quick list of methods rather than skip through a video just to know what he used.

It crazy that anyone can do that.

Some should try sub 10 with 10 methods