Page 2 of 32 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 316

Thread: Triplex

  1. #11
    Member jrb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    WCA Profile
    2011BROW01
    Posts
    261

    Default

    I'm almost done. This is a really fun little puzzle. I'll post when I'm done.
    Cubing again after a long break!

  2. #12
    Member collinbxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    WCA Profile
    2010BURN01
    YouTube
    Collinbxyz
    Posts
    1,218

    Default

    Oh btw, I found an algorithm for inserting an edge for the f2l. like this:




    I don't know how to say it though, since there is no actual notation. Should we make one? This is super fun, so I think we should...
    Oh yes, and I have a good method to get to the point where only the top circle isn't solved.

    This should definitely be turned into a physical puzzle. I think you could contact Oscar who makes puzzles that he or others invent (with their permission, and gives them credit of course). Just an idea of something you could possibly turn this into.
    Last edited by collinbxyz; 10-24-2011 at 02:12 PM.
    1/5/12/50/100 ~ 2x2 (Ortega): 1.359/2.525/2.968/3.297/3.401 - 3x3: 6.250/8.170/9.027/9.667/9.737 - OH: 9.554/14.636/15.525

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Southern Maryland, USA
    Posts
    0

    Default

    collinbxyz-

    You are correct.... I don't have a clue what Megaminx is. I looked it up. There's no way I could wrap my mind around that puzzle.

    However, I think Triplex is closer to Pyraminx as Escher pointed out. Either way, I am still solution-less.

    I think Triplex can be solved by solving any one circle (at the expense of the other two) and then solving the other two without involving the first. I suspect this is how Stefan has solved it. However, this solution has a problem.... you must finish the first circle with the intersection stones and bones in a solvable position. I suspect this is not easy.

    What I really need is two sequences. Each sequence would exchange two stones (or two bones) and leave the rest of the puzzle in tact. That would make my programming task a cake walk. Only thing wrong with that is..... I don't have those two sequences!!!

    Surely, someone must be able to post those sequences! .... no???

    - george

  4. #14
    Administrator pjk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    WCA Profile
    2007KELL02
    YouTube
    pjkcards
    Posts
    4,929
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Did it just sub-5. It is pretty intuitive.

  5. #15
    Member collinbxyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    WCA Profile
    2010BURN01
    YouTube
    Collinbxyz
    Posts
    1,218

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pjk View Post
    Did it just sub-5. It is pretty intuitive.
    Nice... This is what I'm at:



    1/5/12/50/100 ~ 2x2 (Ortega): 1.359/2.525/2.968/3.297/3.401 - 3x3: 6.250/8.170/9.027/9.667/9.737 - OH: 9.554/14.636/15.525

  6. #16
    Member zerkelas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5

    Default

    pjk, what did you do to solve it? I solved red, than green, than blue, than solved the magenta/cyan/yellow/white area.

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by uhallgeo View Post
    I think Triplex can be solved by solving any one circle (at the expense of the other two) and then solving the other two without involving the first. I suspect this is how Stefan has solved it.
    Pretty much, yes. Red part, blue part, green part intuitively, then simple commutators (like LR'L'R one to three times) with setups.

    Quote Originally Posted by uhallgeo View Post
    However, this solution has a problem.... you must finish the first circle with the intersection stones and bones in a solvable position. I suspect this is not easy.
    That's always solvable.

    Quote Originally Posted by uhallgeo View Post
    What I really need is two sequences. Each sequence would exchange two stones (or two bones) and leave the rest of the puzzle in tact.
    That's impossible.

  8. #18
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    6,425

    Default

    I got a 1:08.64 solve using a rough blockbuilding method. I kinda feel like making my own version of this just to try it with proper higames controls...

    EDIT: 49.68 lolol
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.44] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.71] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  9. #19
    Premium Member RaresB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Canada
    WCA Profile
    2011BOST01
    YouTube
    manga0wns
    Posts
    669

    Default

    I got a 1:34.25 just using some intuitive method. It's a very interesting puzzle but it would have a similar mechanism to the 15 sliding puzzle if it was made physical

  10. #20
    Member cuber952's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dixon, IL
    WCA Profile
    2010Brec01
    YouTube
    rubikscuber952
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Got it for the first time in about 5-6 min.
    If I were to eat myself, Would I become twice as big or disappear completely?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •