Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: Parity on higher order puzzles.

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirjava View Post
    I know, but I don't know why you gave 3x3x3 as an example of a base puzzle when 2x2x2 has a lower order than it.
    Maybe because it's a more common puzzle?? Ok, then 2x2x2 is a lower order 3x3x3 :P

    Per

    And i believe the 3x3x3 was invented before 2x2x2 right?? Or at least was released before it
    Last edited by mrCage; 08-10-2011 at 08:07 AM.

  2. #12
    Premium Member JonnyWhoopes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    WCA Profile
    2011GRAY02
    YouTube
    JonnyWhoopes
    Posts
    955

    Default

    Not trying to be facetious, but then how do we determine what the base puzzle is? Is the megaminx just a lower order gigaminx?
    To be honest
    I don't really think
    We should have signatures at all

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JonnyWhoopes View Post
    Not trying to be facetious, but then how do we determine what the base puzzle is? Is the megaminx just a lower order gigaminx?
    Correct! Teraminx is higher order gigaminx (or megaminx). Petaminx is higher order teraminx (or etc ...)

    Per

    Then what is flowerminx?? ...
    Last edited by mrCage; 08-10-2011 at 08:25 AM.

  4. #14
    Colourful Kirjava's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    WCA Profile
    2006BARL01
    YouTube
    snkenjoi
    Posts
    5,311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrCage View Post
    Maybe because it's a more common puzzle??
    Quote Originally Posted by mrCage View Post
    And i believe the 3x3x3 was invented before 2x2x2 right?? Or at least was released before it
    These are both very silly reasons.

    Your definition of "base puzzle" and "higher order puzzle" is arbitrary. Nothing wrong with this, it just makes it somewhat meaningless.

  5. #15
    Premium Member JonnyWhoopes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    WCA Profile
    2011GRAY02
    YouTube
    JonnyWhoopes
    Posts
    955

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrCage View Post
    Correct! Teraminx is higher order gigaminx (or megaminx). Petaminx is higher order teraminx (or etc ...)

    Per

    Then what is flowerminx?? ...
    So, you're pretty much just asking "what puzzles have parity" right? If we have no definition of a base puzzle, or what higher order means, then this is what it comes down to.
    To be honest
    I don't really think
    We should have signatures at all

  6. #16

    Default

    2x2x2 and 3x3x3 are small cubes or "lower order cubes". 4x4x4+ are higher order or big cubes. Megaminx is what we started with so I assume that is what you mean by the "base" puzzle.
    Quote Originally Posted by mrCage View Post
    Correct! Teraminx is higher order gigaminx (or megaminx). Petaminx is higher order teraminx (or etc ...)

    Per

    Then what is flowerminx?? ...
    A flowerminx is a 2x2x2 dodecahedron. The creator decided not to use the mathematical term I guess. The real name for it would be "whatever comes before mega" and minx.

    ON topic:
    OLL edge parity: Only even numbered cubes
    PLL parity: Only even numbered cubes.
    OLL corner parity: Uh... only pops?
    Edge paring parity: All big cubes that involve edge pairing. (This means "cubes" not other twistypuzzles like dodecahedrons).

    If I missed anything about regular cubes, please add on.

  7. #17
    Colourful Kirjava's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    WCA Profile
    2006BARL01
    YouTube
    snkenjoi
    Posts
    5,311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oddlespuddle View Post
    2x2x2 and 3x3x3 are small cubes or "lower order cubes".
    Why?

    Quote Originally Posted by oddlespuddle View Post
    A flowerminx is a 2x2x2 dodecahedron. The creator decided not to use the mathematical term I guess. The real name for it would be "whatever comes before mega" and minx.
    Kilominx is something else.

  8. #18
    Member uberCuber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    WCA Profile
    2011THOM01
    Posts
    2,901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oddlespuddle View Post
    OLL edge parity: Only even numbered cubes
    PLL parity: Only even numbered cubes.
    OLL corner parity: Uh... only pops?
    Edge paring parity: All big cubes that involve edge pairing. (This means "cubes" not other twistypuzzles like dodecahedrons).
    These are assuming reduction method, though, which not everybody uses. Because PLL parity isn't parity at all, and what you are referring to as "OLL edge pairty" and "edge pairing parity" become the same thing.
    5x5 (1/5/12/25/50/100)
    1:06.40, 1:13.30, 1:15.20, 1:16.48, 1:18.11, 1:18.61

  9. #19
    Member qqwref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a <script> tag near you
    WCA Profile
    2006GOTT01
    YouTube
    qqwref2
    Posts
    6,425

    Default

    A pretty good rule of thumb is that any turn of 1/(2n+1) of a full rotation can't cause parity (whereas turns of 1/(2n) can). So, any higher-order Pyraminx, Megaminx, Dino Cube, Skewb, and so on can't have parity, in the sense of being able to do a pure 2-cycle without affecting any other pieces.
    Computer cube PB averages of 12: [Clock: 5.72] [Pyraminx: 3.44] [Megaminx: 49.52]
    [2x2: 2.66] [3x3: 8.71] [4x4: 29.06] [5x5: 52.69] [6x6: 1:34.78] [7x7: 2:20.34]

  10. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    WCA Profile
    2008COUR01
    Posts
    1,461

    Default

    I think you mean any other pieces of the same orbit, or else the corners+centers parity of the 4^3 for example wouldn't qualify as a parity.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •