Square-1 Race

[vcuber13]

whats funny?

[theanonymouscuber]

LOL I suck. Oh well. Joining race to sub 30.

Round 1: 1:43.18

1. (DNF) (0,0) (0,-3) (0,3) (-3,2) (4,1) (4,3) (0,2) (6,0) (-3,0) (2,3) (0,2) (0,2) (-2,4) (-5,4) (0,5) (6,2) (5,3)
2. 2:05.81 (0,2) (-5,1) (-1,3) (0,3) (-3,3) (3,3) (6,0) (6,3) (0,1) (0,3) (-1,2) (0,3) (1,0) (6,3) (4,3) (4,5)
3. 1:50.52 (0,3) (0,6) (0,3) (6,3) (4,3) (6,2) (0,4) (-3,2) (4,4) (0,5) (0,1) (-3,0) (0,3) (-1,3) (0,4) (-3,0) (6,3)
4. 1:48.05 (0,6) (0,3) (-5,3) (-4,0) (-3,3) (6,5) (1,0) (0,2) (0,4) (0,5) (-1,0) (0,2) (0,4) (6,4) (0,4) (4,0) (-5,0) (0,3)
5. 1:03.94 (3,-1) (0,-2) (0,3) (0,3) (-3,3) (6,3) (0,4) (2,2) (6,3) (6,0) (1,0) (-2,1) (0,2) (0,5) (-4,0) (4,5) (6,0)
6. 1:28.56 (1,0) (0,-1) (3,0) (-4,0) (-5,4) (0,2) (4,0) (-1,2) (6,4) (4,0) (6,0) (2,0) (6,0) (2,0) (4,5) (4,4) (0,4) (2,0)
7. 2:14.95 (6,-4) (-3,-3) (0,3) (3,4) (6,0) (3,3) (3,3) (3,3) (3,0) (6,3) (3,3) (-3,5) (-2,0) (-1,0) (3,1)
8. 1:27.03 (3,-3) (0,6) (-3,0) (-4,1) (0,2) (-2,5) (-1,0) (0,1) (4,0) (6,0) (0,4) (0,2) (-2,2) (0,3) (-2,0) (2,5) (-5,0) (5,0)
9. 2:06.25 (0,-1) (0,6) (-5,3) (0,3) (-4,1) (2,0) (0,4) (0,1) (0,2) (0,2) (-2,0) (2,3) (6,3) (-2,2) (-2,0) (0,4) (2,3)
10. 1:51.86 (0,-3) (6,6) (3,0) (-3,0) (-1,3) (1,0) (0,5) (0,1) (-3,2) (6,3) (-2,0) (-2,5) (6,5) (-4,0) (-4,5) (-4,0) (-4,0)
11. (54.55) (0,6) (6,3) (-3,3) (5,3) (-2,1) (0,5) (-3,0) (0,1) (3,5) (6,3) (4,5) (-2,3) (4,1) (0,4) (0,2) (0,4)
12. 1:14.88 (-5,3) (2,-1) (3,3) (-5,4) (-1,3) (3,0) (1,2) (2,3) (-4,0) (-2,1) (-4,4) (0,1) (1,0) (0,5) (2,4)

[Forte]

whats funny?

my suck

[vcuber13]

if anyones interested: Spreadsheet

[Vinny]

I would try, but I still use Thrawst's method. I average 1:30, plus I'm trying to improve on other cubes right now.

[vcuber13]

there isnt anything wrong with the method, you may not get really fast but i can get sub 40 pretty easily with it.

[Forte]

I would try, but I still use Thrawst's method. I average 1:30, plus I'm trying to improve on other cubes right now.

for edge orientation, you can use (1,0)/(3,0)/(3,0)/(-1,-1)/(-2,1)/(-3,0)/ (this orients the UL and DB edges), just do this a bunch of times

srs thrawst's method is neither beginner friendly nor good >_>

[DavidWoner]

there isnt anything wrong with the method, you may not get really fast but i can get sub 40 pretty easily with it.

Uhhhhh there is A LOT wrong with thrawst's method. If you are trying to minimize number of algs then use Screw, it's sub20able with 5 algs.

[MTGjumper]

I might actually do this. I've done like two solves this year.

[deepSubDiver]

I'm in for sub30 (yeah, that was a quite lucky average..):
27.8, 23.6, 25.8, 28.6, 21.2, 23.3, 26.6, (21.1), 21.5, (29.2), 23.9, 21.3, 24.4 = 24.4