I thought I should comment on this.
It really isn't a bad idea, for someone who already knows CLS, but CLS itself itself, in my opinion, would be much better "usual" systems.
I believe I've mentioned this at least once in my CPLS+2GLL thread, and got a bunch of negative responses. From what I remember, they were something like:
-bad algs
---1/3 of them (NOT 1/6) should be 2-gen. Think "y'"
---the rest can be really sexy 3-gen
-too many algs
---if you learn this I suggest learning CLS first, and the entirety of it. I say this because the benefits of this method aren't quite worth as much as those in regular old CLS.
---half can easily be learnt at first. Mirroring should be second nature; really.
-recognition is "hard" or "confusing" or "time-consuming"
---"confusing" can be fixed easily
---"hard" and "time-consuming" can be fixed eventually. With enough practice, sub-.5 recog is easily doable.
A really awesome person with lots of time could memorize bits of BBF2L, CLS, and CPLS.
With this, they would use...
BBF2L when I/Im cases pop up.
CPLS when 2-gen +/-/O cases pop up.
CLS when non-2-gen +/-/O cases pop up.
But I'm crazy.
Btw, I suck at "quitting." I blame Lucas for posting this thread on FaceBook.
-statue



Reply With Quote
EOCPLS for I/Im alone is like...3*6*8 cases...144. Could be worse. 


Bookmarks