JasonK
Premium Member
1/216Chances of getting 3 PLL skips in a row for 2x2?
1/216Chances of getting 3 PLL skips in a row for 2x2?
Number of people with first Success on nth attempt
Attempts Count Percentage Cumulative 1 482 28.79% 28.79%
Success rate on each attempt
Attempt Successes DNFs Success Rate 1 482 2133 18.43%
This doesn't really fit here but it would be nice to have a "next comps" space in each WCA member's page showing the comp he/she has already registered for
How comes that those percentages are different?
I don't see how this would be possible as LOTS of competitions don't use the WCA registration system.
How comes that those percentages are different?
It would be nice to have it at least for the comps that use it
Not everyone has had a success.
Define 'poor'. Of course it was computer generated. Feliks was also presumably not too many moves, just like everyone else with a 1.5 singlePoor scramble really... if it wasn't for the poor scramble (computer generated yeah [-I hope!] ) then Felik's would be no.1 single for 2-5 order rubik's cubes.
And Felik's solve was 11 moves. Christian's was about 4.
Nope, Feliks' 1.12 was 11 moves. A 1.12 or 1.21, idr exactly which.
Nope, Feliks' 1.12 was 11 moves. A 1.12 or 1.21, idr exactly which.
A scramble that either was really short, or went back on itself leaving the cube solvable in very few moves. Obviously it was computer generated sorry for suggesting it wasn't! Shouldn't there be a double-check that the scramble isn't ridiculously easy? What if a 3x3 get's randomly scrambled so that it's solved by 2 moves? Would that be accepted?
And Felik's solve was 11 moves. Christian's was about 4.
At Phalsbourg open 2012 I was scrambling for 2^3 when we (the scramblers) noticed that the 5th scramble of the group had a 2-move solution. So we called the delegate (Clément), and after saying "oh no, why does it happen to me ?" and trying (apparently unsuccessfully) to make a phone call, he told us to replace that silly scramble by the first scramble of an extra group he had generated scrambles for just in case.A scramble that either was really short, or went back on itself leaving the cube solvable in very few moves. Obviously it was computer generated sorry for suggesting it wasn't! Shouldn't there be a double-check that the scramble isn't ridiculously easy? What if a 3x3 get's randomly scrambled so that it's solved by 2 moves? Would that be accepted?
A scramble that either was really short, or went back on itself leaving the cube solvable in very few moves. Obviously it was computer generated sorry for suggesting it wasn't! Shouldn't there be a double-check that the scramble isn't ridiculously easy? What if a 3x3 get's randomly scrambled so that it's solved by 2 moves? Would that be accepted?
And Felik's solve was 11 moves. Christian's was about 4.
Just noticed, thanks!